Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal

1) charitable activities that the charity carries out on its own through employees volunteers or intermediaries and 2) qualifying disbursements that the charity makes through gifts to qualified donees or grants to non-qualified donees (grantees).

C$5.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
158
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$435k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 158 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k73 grants · C$274k
  • C$10k–50k60 grants · C$1.5M
  • C$50k–250k20 grants · C$2.1M
  • C$250k+5 grants · C$1.7M
C$12,195
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MYLU TEAM LLCC$435,000
Individual grant recipientC$390,000
IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATIC$309,213
Individual grant recipientC$261,000
Individual grant recipientC$258,300
Individual grant recipientC$238,887
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB)C$194,781
CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIMC$182,147
TIFERES YOEL INCC$150,000
Individual grant recipientC$145,178
RABINICAL COLLEGE OH SHIMON YISROELC$120,785
CONG LIVYAS CHEIN INCC$120,000
Individual grant recipientC$100,000
Individual grant recipientC$93,705
Individual grant recipientC$92,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 80% of grant dollars (C$16M). The 20% that went abroad (C$3.9M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 20% of all-years giving (C$3.9M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$3.2M · 67 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$15M · 90 repeat orgsC$4.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

90 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 93 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
51

Total granted

C$15M
C$356k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

94%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$1.4M · revenue +76%
  • CY
    CONG YETEV LEV SATMAR
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$829k · revenue +628%
  • IC
    IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATI
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$650k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AO
    ACHEINU ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$82k
  • AO
    ACHEINU ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$54k · revenue +49%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'ECOLE MAIMONIDE
    one grant, 2023 · C$22k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
2
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
3
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—
4
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
5
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
6
Kolel Yeshivat Kehilat Jacob

To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york

—
7
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
8
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
9
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
10
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
11
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
12
Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Congregation of the Upholders of the Law of Torah (Machzikei Torah) of Montréal / La congrégation des observants de la loi de la Torah Mschzikei de montréal and the most unlike its peers is Chessed Chain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

147 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 147 of the 234 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
54
Early backer (in before they grew)
135/147
Grantees still filing
82/147
Grew since you first funded

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$1,376,781 over 7y, 13% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) — C$840,301 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetCONG YETEV LEV SATMAR — C$828,695 over 7y, 18% of budgetIMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATI — C$650,156 over 7y, 18% of budgetBNEI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$614,676 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetCHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV — C$451,841 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetEIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION/ ASSOCIA — C$174,945 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCHASDEI LEVY YITZCHOK — C$171,559 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH — C$162,593 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$161,996 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONG BELZ — C$153,267 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL — C$153,061 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. — C$138,934 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT WIZNITZ — C$130,617 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetEZER LANEFESH FOUNDATION — C$130,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCONGREGATION YETEV LEV — C$117,370 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetKEREN HAKEHILAH — C$116,043 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetCONG TZEMACH TZADIK — C$97,225 over 5y, 55% of budgetCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$88,266 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetKEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ — C$66,063 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS — C$64,242 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$63,296 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOHEL TORAH CONGREGATION — C$60,884 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetREFUAH V'CHESED — C$58,807 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCONG AHAVATH ISRAEL — C$55,311 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetCENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE BNOIS YISROEL — C$54,362 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$51,132 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZ UMACHZ — C$50,447 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCHABAD CENTRE — C$47,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFAIRE REVIVRE/LHACHYOIS — C$46,040 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$44,546 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YETEV LEV — C$41,994 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCONGRÉGATION SKVER — C$40,907 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF ATERES BUNOS — C$40,063 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetKUPAT TORAH VECHESED — C$39,889 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMENUCHA V'SIMCHA — C$36,550 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF SATMAR ERETZ YISROEL — C$35,461 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM LADIES ASSOCIATION — C$34,048 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'CHOLEH — C$31,823 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF TOLDOS AHARON — C$30,512 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetCORPS DE BÉNÉVOLES HATZOLOH — C$28,145 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetKEHILAS BELZ — C$27,296 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM — C$25,517 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ECOLE MAIMONIDE — C$22,343 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCF OF KIRYAS YOEL — C$21,989 over 3y, 11% of budgetCONGREATION SKVER MONTREAL — C$21,719 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetVIZNITZ MONTRÉAL CENTRE — C$21,406 over 2y, 11% of budgetEB MAYER BAAL HANES-CHIBAS JERUSALEM — C$20,342 over 7y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM ↗
  • Who funds MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) ↗
  • Who funds CONG YETEV LEV SATMAR ↗
  • Who funds IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATI ↗
  • Who funds BNEI LEVY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF UTA MESIFTA OF KIRYAS JOAL ↗
  • Who funds EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION/ ASSOCIA ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI LEVY YITZCHOK ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONG BELZ ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT WIZNITZ ↗
  • Who funds EZER LANEFESH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HAKEHILAH ↗
  • Who funds CONG TZEMACH TZADIK ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF ↗
  • Who funds KEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ ↗
  • Who funds WIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE YAD EZER FUND ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maharam Tav FundQC86.6× affinity100 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maharam Tav Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Menucha Vesimcha · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 234 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 703227322:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal’s filings →