Outremont, QC · Private foundation
The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.
To distribute funds to qualified donees as defined in the income tax act (canada)
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k22 grants · C$77k
- C$10k–50k13 grants · C$355k
- C$50k–250k13 grants · C$1.7M
- C$250k+18 grants · C$20M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$5,464,858 |
| CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TOMCHEI DALIM | C$2,920,931 |
| CANADIAN FRIENDS OF KEREN HATZOLAH | C$1,924,005 |
| ACHIM TORONTO | C$1,589,222 |
| MAHARAM TAV FUND | C$1,356,000 |
| CF OF YETEV LEV | C$1,021,600 |
| CANADIAN FRIENDS OF VAAD HARABBANIM | C$766,450 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$733,500 |
| KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE | C$648,000 |
| VMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY | C$558,911 |
| CHARITY TSEDAKAH MONTREAL- CAD | C$507,880 |
| KEREN HAKEHILAH | C$506,000 |
| CONGRÉGATION ET YECHIVA ZERA KODESH | C$485,000 |
| KEHILAS BELZ | C$453,000 |
| ACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC | C$405,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 86% of grant dollars (C$140M). The 14% that went abroad (C$23M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 14% of all-years giving (C$23M)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.
105 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 104 since wound down; 65 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$22M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TDTOMCHEI DAIM CF7× · 2017–2023 · C$24M · revenue +86% · 95% of their budget
- ABACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC.7× · 2017–2023 · C$9.3M · revenue +92% · 39% of their budget
- ZCZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY6× · 2018–2023 · C$7.5M · revenue +5%
Funded once
- VVMMone grant, 2017 · C$1.7M
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · C$300k
- BCBNEI CHESED FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · C$270k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at yeshivat wiznitz.
Issued scholarships for religious education
To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
The charity provides scholarship to needy students
To advance religion by providing financial assistance to jewish boys and men interested in pursuing high religious studies.
Support of jewish education and institutions
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Congregation of the Upholders of the Law of Torah (Machzikei Torah) of Montréal / La congrégation des observants de la loi de la Torah Mschzikei de montréal and the most unlike its peers is Rav Chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 208 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI DAIM CF ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF KEREN HATZOLOH ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds CF OF YETEV LEV ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FONDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds CONGRÉGATION OHEI-CHAIM ↗
- Who funds MAHARAN TAV FUND ↗
- Who funds CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF VAAD HARABBANIM ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE MESTIFA YOEL MOSHE OF CAM ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SORO BOHEL ↗
- Who funds ANIYEI IRCHO ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TOLDOS AHARON ↗
- Who funds CHASDEI LEVY YITZCOK ↗
- Who funds CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV ↗
- Who funds VIZNITZ INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MESIVTA TORAH V'VIRAH ↗
- Who funds CONGRÉGATION GOOD HEART: CONGRÉGATION YETEV LAV ↗
- Who funds MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) ↗
- Who funds KEREN HABINYAN D'SATMAR FUND ↗
- Who funds TOSH BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DIFFUSER LE SOLEIL ↗
- Who funds FONDS IMMOBILIER SATMAR/SATMAR BUILDING FUND ↗
- Who funds EZEAS MENACHEM AVROHOM LOAN FUND ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BE'ER YITZCHAK ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'ACHOLEH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Congrégation des Seniors Couronnés / Congregation Atereth Zekainim · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Menucha Vesimcha · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.