Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Institut T.O.R.A. / T.O.R.A. Institute

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide chartable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of jewish faith.

C$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$990k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$110k
  • C$50k–250k6 grants · C$822k
  • C$250k+5 grants · C$2.5M
C$98,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$137k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRE CHABADC$990,410
KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$692,000
KEHAI MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ / KMHBC$313,500
EZER LANEFESH / ELFC$258,000
EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATIONC$250,000
COLLEGE RABBINIQUE DU QUEBECC$240,000
COLLEGE RABBINIQUE DE QUEBEC TOMCHEI TMIMIMC$210,510
CHESED L'AVRAHAMC$136,200
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$98,500
OHEL TORAH CONGREGATIONC$73,500
TIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEM SYNAGOGUEC$63,200
COMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD ZICHRON KEDOSHIMC$40,500
KOLLEL MENACHEMC$32,000
KEHILAS BELZ/REGROUPEMENT COMMUNAUTAIREC$13,000
ACADÉMIE YÉSHIVA YAVNÉC$12,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$8.6M · 9 repeat orgsC$2.7M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

C$8.6M
C$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+58%

Still filing today

89%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COLLEGE RABBINIQUE DU QUEBEC
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$2.3M · revenue +84% · 54% of their budget
  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$2.0M · revenue +24%
  • AY
    ACADÉMIE YÉSHIVA YAVNÉ
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$201k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · C$1.2M
  • TL
    TIKVAH L'CHAIM / TZOHAR
    one grant, 2023 · C$222k · revenue +39%
  • VM
    VAAD MISHMERES MITZVOS
    one grant, 2017 · C$71k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
4
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
5
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
6
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
7
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
8
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
9
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
10
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
11
Mehaduras Friedman Foundation

To print and publish religious books. to assist in the printing of the talmud code of jewish law and other religious texts.

—
12
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Academie Hebraique Inc./ Hebrew Academy Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Communauté Sepharade Unifiée du Québec. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
9/24
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE CHABAD — C$2,767,758 over 8y, 31% of budgetCOLLEGE RABBINIQUE DU QUEBEC — C$2,252,050 over 4y, 54% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$1,988,670 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCHASDEI LEVY YITZCOK — C$772,140 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetKEHAI MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ / KMHB — C$514,130 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetEZER LANEFESH / ELF — C$258,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetEIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION — C$250,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetACADÉMIE YÉSHIVA YAVNÉ — C$200,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ SÉPHARADE DE CÔTE ST-LUC BETH RAMBAM — C$105,809 over 2y, 13% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$98,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOHEL TORAH CONGREGATION — C$73,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEM SYNAGOGUE — C$63,200 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD ZICHRON KEDOSHIM — C$40,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetKOLLEL MENACHEM — C$32,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetKEHILAS BELZ/REGROUPEMENT COMMUNAUTAIRE — C$19,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetACADEMIE HEBRAIQUE INC./ HEBREW ACADEMY INC — C$19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNAUTE SEPHARADE UNIFIEE DU QUEBEC — C$13,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$10,120 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHARITÉ TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL / CHARITY TZEDAKAH — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERKAZ HACHINUCH — C$303 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Centre chabadMaharam Tav FundJewish Community Foun…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Rayjo Charitable TrustThe Micha Life Founda…Aaron and Susan Liebe…Rosenberg Family Foun…The M.K. Foundation/L…Federation CjaCongrégation Belz
Hatzolas Yisroel D'ArizalQC16.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Centre chabad · Maharam Tav Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Federation Cja · Congrégation Belz

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 868136896:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Institut T.O.R.A. / T.O.R.A. Institute’s filings →