Montreal, QC · Private foundation
Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation
To provide donations to canadian religious instiutions canadian educational institutions canadian charitable institutions as well as provide gifts of a charitable nature to canadian indigents and to provide scholarships to indigent canadian students carrying on post secondary education.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION B'NAI LEVY | C$6,500 |
| YAM HATALMUD | C$6,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 63 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MVMENUCHA VESIMCHA3× · 2017–2019 · C$74k · revenue +147%
- BCBikur Cholim4× · 2017–2022 · C$62k · revenue +106%
- KBKollel Belz5× · 2017–2022 · C$59k · revenue +158%
Funded once
- MIMAISON ISRAELITE COMMUNAUTAIRES DES EAUX VIVANTES POUR LES Hone grant, 2019 · C$75k · revenue +19% · 35% of their budget
- ECEmunah Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +10%
- CFCanadian Friends of Jewish Youth Libraryone grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue -9% · 48% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse
Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture
To operate a school for higher talmudic studies
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.
Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.
Support of jewish education and institutions
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…
The charity provides scholarship to needy students
The charity furthered the practice of judaism by funding programs in mir yerushalayim including scholarships to deserving students to enable them to pursue religious studies at mir yerushalayim in jerusalem.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Congregation of the Upholders of the Law of Torah (Machzikei Torah) of Montréal / La congrégation des observants de la loi de la Torah Mschzikei de montréal and the most unlike its peers is Chessed Chain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAISON ISRAELITE COMMUNAUTAIRES DES EAUX VIVANTES POUR LES H ↗
- Who funds MENUCHA VESIMCHA ↗
- Who funds Bikur Cholim ↗
- Who funds Kollel Belz ↗
- Who funds Bnai Levi Foundation ↗
- Who funds HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds MADA Total ↗
- Who funds MCB (Mifalei Chaim Bechesed) ↗
- Who funds Congregation Belz ↗
- Who funds YAM HATALMUD ↗
- Who funds MONTREAL TORAH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Congregation Tefilah L'Moshe Total ↗
- Who funds Centre Etude Talmudique ↗
- Who funds Vinzitz Institutions ↗
- Who funds mesivta kerem menachem Total ↗
- Who funds Canadian Friends of Wiznitz ↗
- Who funds Emunah Canada ↗
- Who funds KOLEL CHIBAS YERUSHALAYIM ↗
- Who funds AARON AND SUSAN LIEBERMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ezras Cholim Total ↗
- Who funds Machzikei Torah ↗
- Who funds Communaute Zerah Yacov total ↗
- Who funds Canadian Friends of Jewish Youth Library ↗
- Who funds Kupat Torah Vechiesed ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds Canadian Friends of United Wiznitz ↗
- Who funds Kolel TYY Total ↗
- Who funds Tomchie Shabbos Total ↗
- Who funds Shalva Israel Association ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON HAIM ↗
- Who funds CONGRETATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva Gedola ↗
- Who funds Ne'eman Foundation ↗
- Who funds Community Holy Association ↗
- Who funds Federation CJA ↗
- Who funds (HELP TO HEALTH)EZRAS CHOLIM ↗
- Who funds Beth Oloth ↗
- Who funds Tashbar Institutions ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Maharam Tav Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · The George Kohn Charitable Foundation / la Fondation Charitable George Kohn · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Menucha Vesimcha · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.