Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Boisbriand, QC · Private foundation

Eizer Meshilem Feish Association / Association Eizer Meshilem Feish

Poverty relief by providing assistance to poor people in the form of food clothing and financial assistance.

C$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k13 grants · C$41k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$3,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$157k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHEVRA MESAMCHEI LEVC$10,000
CONGREGATION ZERA KODESHC$7,934
CONGREGATION YETEV LEV KTC$7,500
BETH HILLEL CONGREGATIONC$5,000
TOSH HATZOLAHC$5,000
CONGREGATION YETEV LEVC$3,500
MOSDOS BEER YITZCHOKC$3,000
TORAS MOSHEC$2,425
B'NAI LEVY FOUNDATIONC$1,800
CFO TOLDOS AHARONC$1,500
REFUAH V'CHESEDC$1,200
CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE BNOIS YISROELC$973
BIKOR CHOLIM LADIES ASS.C$860
OHEL ELIMELECH D'TOSHC$776
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$309k · 16 repeat orgsC$97k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
18

Total granted

C$309k
C$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTRE COMMUNATIARE BNOIS YISROEL
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$82k · revenue +194%
  • RM
    REB MEIR BAL HANES
    3× · 2021–2023 · C$51k · revenue +9%
  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZERA KODESH
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$13k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • VZ
    VMM ZICHRON CHAIM
    one grant, 2021 · C$29k · revenue +24%
  • KO
    KOLLEL OITZER SHASS
    one grant, 2023 · C$12k · revenue +39%
  • AP
    AMOUR POUR ISRAEL
    one grant, 2021 · C$11k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
4
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
5
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
6
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
7
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
8
Tikvah L'Chaim/Tzohar

To sponser religious education and seminars. to support poor famalies.

—
9
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
10
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
11
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
12
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Sauvetage Québec / Hatzolah Quebec. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE COMMUNATIARE BNOIS YISROEL — C$81,959 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetBNEI LEVY FOUND — C$54,840 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREB MEIR BAL HANES — C$50,622 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BE'ER TITZCHAK — C$39,751 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetVMM ZICHRON CHAIM — C$29,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION ZERA KODESH — C$13,254 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHEVRA MESAMCHEI LEV — C$11,828 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMOUR POUR ISRAEL — C$11,360 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBETH HILLEL CONGREGATION — C$10,200 over 3y, 38% of budgetCONGREGATION YETEV LEV KT — C$10,160 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHAVEIRIM DONNE LA MAIN — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$8,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAHARAM TAV — C$6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR HOLIM — C$5,960 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS TOLDOS AHARON — C$5,853 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTOSH HATZOLAH — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTORAS MOSHE — C$4,055 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEIZER MORDECHAI — C$3,700 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCONGREGATION OHEL TORAH — C$3,445 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOHEL-CHAIM CONGREGATION — C$3,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$2,766 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIR — C$2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH V'CHESED — C$2,116 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEZRAS MENACHEM AVROHOM LOAN FUND — C$1,168 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKOLEL TOSH — C$1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetOHEL ELIMELECH D'TOSH — C$776 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAD FRIENDS OF YESHIVA SHEARITH HAPLETAH — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBONEL OLAM FOUNDATION INC — C$430 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MONTREAL — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maharam Tav FundCharité Tzedakah Mont…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…The M.K. Foundation/L…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Keren Yecheskel Found…The Micha Life Founda…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…Fondation de la Famil…Menucha VesimchaZichron David and Pes…Fondation B'NAI LEVY …
Maharam Tav FundQC28.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Keren Yecheskel Foundation · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Menucha Vesimcha · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Fondation B'NAI LEVY / B'NAI LEVY Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 734030125:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Eizer Meshilem Feish Association / Association Eizer Meshilem Feish’s filings →