Boisbriand, QC · Charitable organization
Fondation B'NAI LEVY / B'NAI LEVY Foundation
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k30 grants · C$92k
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$85k
- C$50k–250k6 grants · C$800k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONG. MAHARAM TAV FUND | C$242,512 |
| CONG. EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION | C$160,460 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$127,340 |
| CONG. THE YAD EZER FUND | C$94,790 |
| CONG. CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YETEV LEV | C$90,000 |
| CONG. ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY | C$84,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$45,036 |
| CONG. YAM HATALMUD FOUNDATION | C$14,190 |
| CONG. BIKUR CHOLIM LADIES ASSOCIATION | C$12,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$12,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$9,950 |
| CONG. CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV | C$9,100 |
| CONGREGATION SHOMRIM LABOKER | C$9,000 |
| CONG. MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED | C$7,380 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$7,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 77% of grant dollars (C$5.3M). The 23% that went abroad (C$1.6M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 23% of all-years giving (C$1.6M)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$644k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ZCZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY2× · 2017–2018 · C$379k · revenue +158% · 41% of their budget
- HYHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL3× · 2017–2019 · C$283k · revenue +78%
- MTMAHARAM TAV FUND2× · 2017–2018 · C$232k · revenue +238%
Funded once
- CTCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$390k · revenue +495%
- HFHERZOG FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · C$250k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · C$170k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of jewish education and institutions
Solicitation of donations
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
To make donations to charitable organizations
The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.
During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.
Issued scholarships for religious education
Funding for seminaries and other religious colleges.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Congregation Et Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S. Congregation and Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KEHILAS TOSH ↗
- Who funds CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds CF TORH VYIRAH ↗
- Who funds HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds MAHARAM TAV FUND ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL TOSH ↗
- Who funds CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE BNOIS YISROEL ↗
- Who funds KUPAS HACHESED MEORITH ↗
- Who funds AARON AND SISAN LIEBERMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIELDGATE CARES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GERMACH ZICHRON BURECH ZVI ↗
- Who funds KEDISHAS BAIS HAMEDRASH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WERNER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds CONG. EIZER MORDECHAI ↗
- Who funds CHAVERIM DONNE LA MAIN ↗
- Who funds CONG. YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds FONDATION YAM HATALMUD / YAM HATALMUD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL OLTZER SHASS INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Menucha Vesimcha · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.