Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar

To set up a synagogue for prayer and all activities connected to a synagogue.

C$308k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$117k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$14k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$102k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$192k
C$41,150
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$248k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIMC$117,492
CONGREGATION DES LIVRES SAINTS/KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAHC$74,442
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALC$47,010
KAREN HAKEHILIAHC$41,150
EZRAS MENACHEM AVROHOM LOAN FUNDC$14,000
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED ( MCB)C$7,650
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'CHOLEHC$5,000
KOLLEL KESER TORAHC$1,360
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.1M · 11 repeat orgsC$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

C$2.1M
C$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+7%

Still filing today

91%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.3M · revenue +153% · 49% of their budget
  • CT
    CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$285k · revenue +80%
  • CD
    CONGREGATION DES LIVRES SAINTS/KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$242k · revenue +701% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BELZgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$7k · revenue +32%
  • CA
    CONG AND YESHIVA SAIAS
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -100%
  • FB
    FONDATION B'NAI LEVY/ B'NAI LEVY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$4k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
3
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
4
Congrégation Kehal Toldos Yakov Yosef

1.- to foster and encourage the practice and study of the jewish religion and development of behaviour among the jewish community with the goal of advancing the jewish religion. 2. -to organize causes classes lectures and seminars with the…

—
5
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
6
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
7
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
8
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
9
Hatzolas Yisroel D'arizal

To advance education by providing scholarships and financial assistance to students at mosdos belz school in israel. to relieve poverty by providing financial assistance and interest-free loans to the poor. and to undertake activities…

—
10
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
11
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
12
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Congregation Et Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S. Congregation and Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$1,306,036 over 8y, 49% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$285,417 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCONGREGATION DES LIVRES SAINTS/KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH — C$241,845 over 4y, 64% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$91,631 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) — C$64,957 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetKAREN HAKEHILIAH — C$44,394 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetEZRAS MENACHEM AVROHOM LOAN FUND — C$28,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBETH ESTHER ACADAMY — C$11,266 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$6,987 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL — C$6,760 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONG AND YESHIVA SAIAS — C$5,200 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFONDATION B'NAI LEVY/ B'NAI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$3,771 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetC.F OF KIRIAT YOEL — C$2,590 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetKOLLEL KESER TORAH — C$1,360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION OHEL TORAH — C$1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION GOOD HEART-GONGREGATION YETEV LEV — C$413 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The M.K. Foundation/L…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Zichron David and Pes…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundChevrah Msamchei LevFondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…Ezras Menachem Avroho…Congrégation des Seni…The George Kohn Chari…The Micha Life Founda…D E Foundation / la F…
The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.QC17.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Chevrah Msamchei Lev · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund · Congrégation des Seniors Couronnés / Congregation Atereth Zekainim · The George Kohn Charitable Foundation / la Fondation Charitable George Kohn · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 777462128:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar’s filings →