Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund

To provice interest free loand to the needy.

C$946k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$600k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k16 grants · C$28k
  • C$10k–50k9 grants · C$159k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$158k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$600k
C$3,100
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LEO & BINA KOHN FOUNDATIONC$600,000
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$158,418
MIFALEI CHAIM B'CHESEDC$39,616
CONG. KAV SHOLEMC$25,000
CONG SHEVES ACHIMC$20,347
CHEVRA MESAMCHEI LEVC$14,690
CONG YETEV LEVC$14,121
BETH ESTHER ACADEMYC$12,018
KOLLEL TORAH VYLRAH SATMARC$11,676
MAHARAM TAV FUNDC$11,045
HISACHDLS AVRELCHIMC$10,777
YESHIVA TORAS MOISHEC$7,480
CF OF SATMAR ERETZ YISROELC$5,411
KEREN HAKEHLLAHC$3,100
CONG. YETEV LEV PARTC$2,431
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 90% of grant dollars (C$3.8M). The 10% that went abroad (C$439k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 10% of all-years giving (C$439k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.6M · 39 repeat orgsC$632k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
36

Total granted

C$3.6M
C$631k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+7%

Still filing today

82%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AYIYEI IRCHO
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$421k · revenue +320%
  • ZC
    ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$316k · revenue +47%
  • HA
    HATSOLAH ARIZAL
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$153k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • MV
    MENUCHA V'SIMCHA
    one grant, 2017 · C$138k
  • WC
    WIZNITZ COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2021 · C$90k · revenue -86% · 27% of their budget
  • MV
    MENUCHA V'SIMCHA
    one grant, 2018 · C$89k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
4
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
5
Chesed L'Yakov Free Loan / Prêt sans intérêts La bonté de Yakov

To provide interest free loans to needy people.

—
6
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
7
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
8
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
9
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
10
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
11
Congrégation Kehal Toldos Yakov Yosef

1.- to foster and encourage the practice and study of the jewish religion and development of behaviour among the jewish community with the goal of advancing the jewish religion. 2. -to organize causes classes lectures and seminars with the…

—
12
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'institution Kupat Torah Vechesed and the most unlike its peers is Congregation Et Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S. Congregation and Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
31/46
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE LEO & BINA KOHN FOUNDATION — C$800,000 over 2y, 96% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM B'CHESED — C$660,589 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetAYIYEI IRCHO — C$420,504 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$316,107 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHATSOLAH ARIZAL — C$152,560 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSHEVAS ACHIM — C$151,718 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetBETH ESTHER — C$92,226 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWIZNITZ COMMUNITY — C$90,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetKAV SHULEM — C$88,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAS TORAS MOSHE — C$70,516 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetC.F.SATMAR ERETZ YISROEL — C$60,494 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetCONG SAIAS — C$60,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCONG YETV LEV D'SATMAR — C$53,737 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetSHEVRA MESAMCHEL LEV — C$52,724 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCONGREGATION WIZNITZ — C$50,040 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$49,234 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONG YETEV LEV — C$38,643 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetGZBZ BEMACH ZICHRON BURECH ZVI — C$35,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCONG YESHIVA ZERA KODESH — C$26,512 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetBELZ CSL — C$20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMESIFTA VYOEL MOSHE — C$19,440 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH VYLRAH SATMAR — C$17,676 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCONGR. GATE OF DAVID BOBOV — C$5,368 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetKIRYAS BUNOS — C$5,263 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBEER YITZCHAK — C$4,750 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCONG OF THE COMMUNITY OF PREFONTAINE — C$4,609 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSPANISH & PORTUGESE SYNAGOGUE CONGREG — C$4,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYALDEI — C$4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAT TORAH VECHESED — C$3,805 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREFUA VECHESED — C$3,368 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCDN.FRIENDS YETEV LEV — C$2,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION — C$2,226 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHEL TORAH CONGREGATION — C$2,220 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOHR LANEFESH — C$2,166 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHATZOLAH — C$2,020 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHR LENEFESH — C$1,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONG BOBOV — C$1,355 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCTM — C$1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN MENACHEM — C$1,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCDN. FRIENDS OF BONAI LOLAM — C$930 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONGR. TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$544 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAH — C$501 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVISNITZ INSTITUTION — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAVERIM — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKVER — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH JACOB TEACHERS COLLEGE — C$18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LEO & BINA KOHN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIFALEI CHAIM B'CHESED ↗
  • Who funds AYIYEI IRCHO ↗
  • Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds HATSOLAH ARIZAL ↗
  • Who funds SHEVAS ACHIM ↗
  • Who funds BETH ESTHER ↗
  • Who funds WIZNITZ COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds KAV SHULEM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS TORAS MOSHE ↗
  • Who funds C.F.SATMAR ERETZ YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds CONG SAIAS ↗
  • Who funds CONG YETV LEV D'SATMAR ↗
  • Who funds SHEVRA MESAMCHEL LEV ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION WIZNITZ ↗
  • Who funds MAHARAM TAV FUND ↗
  • Who funds CONG YETEV LEV ↗
  • Who funds GZBZ BEMACH ZICHRON BURECH ZVI ↗
  • Who funds CONG YESHIVA ZERA KODESH ↗
  • Who funds BELZ CSL ↗
  • Who funds MESIFTA VYOEL MOSHE ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL TORAH VYLRAH SATMAR ↗
  • Who funds CONGR. GATE OF DAVID BOBOV ↗
  • Who funds KIRYAS BUNOS ↗
  • Who funds BEER YITZCHAK ↗
  • Who funds CONG OF THE COMMUNITY OF PREFONTAINE ↗
  • Who funds SPANISH & PORTUGESE SYNAGOGUE CONGREG ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The M.K. Foundation/L…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundMifalei Chaim Bechese…Zichron David and Pes…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Fondation de la Famil…Congrégation des Seni…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…Rosenberg Family Foun…D E Foundation / la F…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…
The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.QC39× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Congrégation des Seniors Couronnés / Congregation Atereth Zekainim · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-07-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 887644664:2024-07-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan’s filings →