Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Congregation of the Community of Prefontaine

Religious daily services for the congregation.

C$437k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$422k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$15k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$422k
C$4,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION CHASIDEI SATMARC$422,097
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉALC$6,580
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESEDC$4,000
ARIZALC$2,830
RABBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL MOSHEC$1,300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$468k · 6 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

C$468k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+139%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONGREGATION CHASIDEI SATMAR
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$426k · revenue +45%
  • AB
    ACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC.
    3× · 2017–2022 · C$6k · revenue +92%
  • H4
    H2V 4B4
    2× · 2017–2022 · C$1k · revenue +894%

Funded once

  • CT
    CHASDEI TOVIM MEOROS
    one grant, 2017 · C$6k
  • VM
    VAAD MISHMERES MITZVOS
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k
  • MV
    MENUCHA VESIMCHAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
3
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—
4
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
5
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
6
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
7
Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund

To provice interest free loand to the needy. to provide grants to qualified donees to enable them to carry on their work

—
8
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
9
Gemach Zichron Yechiel

This organization provides interest-free loans to persons of low income.

—
10
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
11
Chesed L'Yakov Free Loan / Prêt sans intérêts La bonté de Yakov

To provide interest free loans to needy people.

—
12
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Ohel Chaim/Ohel Chaim Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONGREGATION CHASIDEI SATMAR — C$426,397 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetCONGREGATION OHEL CHAIM — C$16,707 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL — C$9,580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMifalei Chaim Bechesed — C$8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARIZAL — C$2,830 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetH2V 4B4 — C$1,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL MOSHE — C$1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION GOOD HEART - CONGREGATION YETEV LEV — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREFUAH V'CHESED — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The M.K. Foundation/L…Congregation Sheves A…Ezras Menachem Avroho…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundHatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Keren Yecheskel Found…Congrégation des Seni…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Académie Yeshiva Tora…Académie Beth Esther …Congrégation Good Hea…
The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.QC12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Congregation Sheves Achim · Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Keren Yecheskel Foundation · Congrégation des Seniors Couronnés / Congregation Atereth Zekainim · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal · Académie Beth Esther Inc. / Beth Esther Academy Inc. · Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations advancing religion.

Source object 888188042:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Congregation of the Community of Prefontaine’s filings →