Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav

The organisation operates and maintains a synagogue which is open daily for members.

C$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$13k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$113k
C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEVC$44,700
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALC$31,987
IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATION DU CANADAC$26,400
SATMAR VAN HORNE JEWISH EDUCATION CENTRE/CENTRE ÉDUCATIF JUIC$10,000
CONGREGATION OHEL TORAHC$6,000
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONC$2,000
ACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOISHEC$2,000
CONGREGATION GATE DAVID OF BOBOVC$1,630
CONGREGATION ATERETH ZEKAINIM/CONGREGATION DES SENIORS COUROC$560
PUITS DE NOS VIES/MEKOR CHAYEINYC$460
ACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC/BETH ESTHER ACADEMY INCC$300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$638k · 17 repeat orgsC$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
12

Total granted

C$638k
C$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATION DU CANADA
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$216k · revenue +26%
  • OT
    OHEL TORAH CONGREGATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$85k · revenue ×12
  • CM
    CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$82k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • SB
    SATMAR BUILDING FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$1.0M · revenue +69%
  • AI
    ANIYEI IRCHO
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k · revenue -5%
  • MT
    MAHARAM TAV FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$7k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
3
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
4
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
5
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
6
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
7
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
8
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
9
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
10
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
11
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
12
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Ohel Chaim/Ohel Chaim Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATION DU CANADA — C$216,150 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetOHEL TORAH CONGREGATION — C$85,030 over 5y, 16% of budgetCHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV — C$82,330 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$78,742 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBeth Ester Academy — C$56,300 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF VAAD HARABONIM — C$39,557 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetB'nai Levy Foundation — C$22,014 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANIYEI IRCHO — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSATMAR VAN HORNE JEWISH EDUCATION CENTRE/CENTRE ÉDUCATIF JUI — C$14,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED — C$10,493 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREAGTION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR — C$7,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$7,160 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF ATERES BUNOS — C$5,734 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$4,765 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOISHE — C$4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION OHEL CHAIM — C$4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal — C$4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION GATE DAVID OF BOBOV — C$3,930 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YETEV LEV — C$2,896 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HABINYAN D'SATMAR FUND — C$2,200 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION OF PREFONTAINE — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONGRÉGATION DES LIVRES SAINTS/KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKollel Toldos Yakov Yosef — C$1,450 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL MOSHE OF CANADA — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION ATERETH ZEKAINIM/CONGREGATION DES SENIORS COURO — C$560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUITS DE NOS VIES/MEKOR CHAYEINY — C$460 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.QC27.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Académie Beth Esther Inc. / Beth Esther Academy Inc. · École Mesifta Yoel Moshe

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 106968035:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav’s filings →