Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Canadian Friends of Satmar Eretz Yisrael
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to enable them to follow religious course being given at the satmar yeshiva in bnei brak in israel.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$5k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE | C$10,600 |
| KEREN HAKEHILAH | C$1,920 |
| CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MESIVTA TORAH V'VIRAH OF U T A | C$1,200 |
| KOLLEL TORAH VYIRAH | C$1,000 |
| MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) | C$600 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +87% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AYACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE7× · 2017–2024 · C$52k · revenue +109%
- ABACADEMIE BETH ESTER5× · 2017–2023 · C$12k · revenue +92%
- CYCONGREGATION YETEV LEV6× · 2017–2023 · C$10k · revenue +894%
Funded once
- CCTMone grant, 2023 · C$1k
- BHBIKOUR HOLIMgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$800 · revenue +87%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
To operate a school for higher talmudic studies
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
The charity opertes a school for jewish children
To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Rav Chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIE BETH ESTER ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV ↗
- Who funds CONG. SEHVAS ACHIM D'SATMAR ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL TORAH VYIRAH ↗
- Who funds M.C.B. ↗
- Who funds KEREN HAKEHILAH ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MESIVTA TORAH V'VIRAH OF U T A ↗
- Who funds BIKOUR HOLIM ↗
- Who funds REFUAH V'CHESED ↗
- Who funds YALDEI SHASHUIM DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF KIRYAS JOEL MONROE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Chevrah Msamchei Lev · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.