Skip to content

Kentucky · Nonprofit

WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY

WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY (Kentucky) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $292,348 to it, the largest being T CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION DBA THRIVE CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION ($175,240). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.3M
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$292k
Net assets
$2.0M
2/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%
01What it does

What Women's Dermatologic Society does

Mission

The mission of the Women's Dermatologic Society is to empower and connect members to advance women dermatologists through personal and professional development, mentorship, service, and leadership.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Annual meeting - to provide a forum for developing relationships through mentoring and building of coalitions. To provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and research relevant to women's issues.

    $228,058 spent$144,407 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  2. Legacy celebration - the legacy celebration is a gathering to thank all attendees, donors, and supporters who help make wds possible.

    $161,235 spent$141,325 earned by the program
    13% of program spending
  3. Wds forum/ivwg - the industry visioning work group (ivwg) forum provided a unique opportunity for members and industry partners to strategically plan and discuss the common problems faced as a specialty. This is a crucial link between dermatologists and the international corporate business community, and will help expand the conversation and cross boundaries to embrace medical, surgical, oncologic, cosmetic, pediatric, and technical subspecialties. The membership enrichment & leadership development (meld) forum provided networking for attendees and getting to know one another. The meld forum was a success featuring a robust cme program with speakers from different areas of women's health, topics on leadership, as well as the latest updates in dermatology.

    $236,447 spent$381,603 earned by the program
    19% of program spending
  4. Other program services - grants provided to other organizations, membership related expenses, community advancement awards, mentorship program, fellowship awards, play safe in the sun meeting, tipp program, and journal expenses.

    $645,497 spentof which $201,564 as grants$550,511 earned by the program
    51% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,271,237.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.4M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($2.2M)2018 Revenue 122 ($1.7M) Expenses 97 ($1.4M) Net assets 107 ($2.3M)2019 Revenue 112 ($1.5M) Expenses 119 ($1.7M) Net assets 108 ($2.3M)2020 Revenue 49 ($666k) Expenses 73 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.2M)2021 Revenue 67 ($911k) Expenses 52 ($747k) Net assets 115 ($2.5M)2022 Revenue 84 ($1.1M) Expenses 103 ($1.5M) Net assets 83 ($1.8M)2023 Revenue 118 ($1.6M) Expenses 122 ($1.7M) Net assets 89 ($1.9M)2024 Revenue 97 ($1.3M) Expenses 97 ($1.4M) Net assets 94 ($2.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (97)Expenses (97)Net assets (94)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2.8M to $2.1M (−23%).

$2.5M
$2.6M
$2.6M
$2.4M
$2.8M
$2.1M
$2.3M
$2.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

4% of WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,632 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$63k
’17
$276k
’18
−$177k
’19
−$374k
’20
$165k
’21
−$326k
’22
−$123k
’23
−$57k
’24
0.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2824272427242322
Joined·+4+6+5+9+6+8+5
No longer listed·8386996
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $6k → $25.

4 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

36% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY.

60%
largest funder
94%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 83% · 2019 89% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Kentucky, across 3 states in all.

WA
IN
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’22
Kentucky out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $105k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $292k to it.

Operating margin−4% · below the median
Months of reserve0.6mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,126 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Kentucky

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 8%Fundraising 0%

Governance

22
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

53%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

VA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY?
WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY (Kentucky) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $292,348 to it, the largest being T CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION DBA THRIVE CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION ($175,240). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $292,348 in grants to WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY?
T CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION DBA THRIVE CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $175,240 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOMEN'S DERMATOLOGIC SOCIETY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kentucky. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing