Minnesota · Nonprofit
WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION
WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION (Minnesota) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $89,900 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($70,900). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2021
- $46k
- Funders on record
- 3
- Grants received
- $90k
- Net assets
- $12k
What Women Candidate Development Coalition does
Mission
Develop women candidates
As stated on its FY2021 Form 990-EZ.
Programs
Educational projects and informational meetings to encourage women to become actively involved in minnesota's civic and governmental process.
$61,887 spentof which $26,220 as grants89% of program spendingEstablishment and expansion of a statewide women's network.
$4,916 spentof which $4,916 as grants7% of program spendingConduction of research on the number of women holding office at all levels of government in minnesota and on campaign techniques which are effective for women candidates.
$2,389 spentof which $1,639 as grants3% of program spending
The 3 programs described on its FY2021 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $69,192.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $16k → $7k.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 99% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 79% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 63% · 2019 74% · 2020 73% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
99% of WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Minnesota funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $89k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Minnesota
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
83%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION?
- WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION (Minnesota) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $89,900 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($70,900). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $89,900 in grants to WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION?
- DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $70,900 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WOMEN CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT COALITION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Women Candidate Development Coalition →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2021–2021), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing