New York · Nonprofit
WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC
WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $50,256 to it, the largest being A LINDSAY & OLIVE B O'CONNOR FOUNDATION INC ($30,210). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,812 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,812 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Marge and Randy Becker Foundationlocal
- North Carolina Housing Coalition Incportfolio match
- Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 87% · 2018 81% · 2019 87% · 2020 80% · 2021 92% · 2022 83% · 2023 93% · 2024 91% · 2025 90%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
91% of WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (61% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $2k → $16.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 99% · 2021 100% · 2022 53% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC's grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $46 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 202 organizations that share them.
- The Marge and Randy Becker FoundationlocalNY · funds 5 organizations near you
- North Carolina Housing Coalition Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New York Mortgage Coalition Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Consumer Credit Counseling Service of San Francisco Dba Balanceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Housing Assistance Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Community Reinvestment Coalition Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Center for New York City Neighborhoods Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Homefree USA Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Federation of Appalachian Housing Enterprises Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Field Hall Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Impact100 Westchester Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In New York
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
89% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Part of a family of 3 related entities
- Stamford Village Housing LP · partnership
- Grand Gorge Housing Partnership · partnership
- Moresville Development Corp · corp_trust
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC?
- WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $50,256 to it, the largest being A LINDSAY & OLIVE B O'CONNOR FOUNDATION INC ($30,210). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $50,256 in grants to WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC?
- A LINDSAY & OLIVE B O'CONNOR FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $30,210 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WESTERN CATSKILLS COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION COUNCIL INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing