· Private foundation
Robinson-Broadhurst Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $173k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+1 grant · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEADWATERS EMS INC | $350,000 |
| STAMFORD VILLAGE LIBRARY | $200,000 |
| STAMFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL | $176,139 |
| TOWN OF WINCHENDON PUBLIC SCHOOL | $170,000 |
| WENDELL P CLARK MEMORIAL ASSOC | $150,000 |
| TWN OF WINCHENDON | $150,000 |
| TOWN OF WINCHENDON COMM ACTION | $105,000 |
| TOWN OF WINCHENDON FIRE DEPT | $98,718 |
| Individual grant recipient | $80,000 |
| HEADWATERS EMS INC | $78,342 |
| STAMFORD JOINT FIRE DISTRICT | $75,000 |
| THE UNITATIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCH | $75,000 |
| STAMFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL | $65,205 |
| STAMFORD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $55,000 |
| CATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE | $54,559 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $725k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
113 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $396k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLStamford Library9× · 2017–2025 · $391k · revenue +572%
- WCWINCHENDON COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE8× · 2017–2024 · $356k · revenue +904% · 47% of their budget
- TRTHE ROXBURY ARTS GROUP INC9× · 2017–2025 · $354k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $1.5M
- TOTWN OF WINCHENDON PLAN & DEVone grant, 2017 · $54k
- SJST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $43k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A public library with locations in catskill and palenville, new york providing reference materials and various on-line services.
The Catskill Center for Conservation and Development, Inc. (the Catskill Center) is a not-for-profit organization under the non-profit laws of the State of New York. The mission of the Catskill Center is to preserve and enrich the…
The organization's primary purpose is to administer watershed protection and partnership programs necessary to maintain and enhance the water quality in the west of hudson watershed and to make decisions on funding and implementation of…
To provide various programs to purchase, build or rehabilitate structures to make affordable housing available to the elderly and those of low to moderate income.
A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire
To hold and manage open space property for the public's benefit and assist in the preservation and stewardship of the scenic beauty, natural communities and recreational amenities in greene county, ny and surrounding areas.
Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.
To advance the commercial, industrial, educational, cultural, recreational and general welfare of the monadnock region of southwest new hampshire.
The corporation was formed to operate various programs to assist in the development of the mentally and physically disabled. we assist the people we serve through a continuum of service that fosters community participation and personal…
The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.
Ambulance and rescue service for town of waterford, new york
The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Catskills Community Revitalization Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Catskill Recreation Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Stamford Library ↗
- Who funds WINCHENDON COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds THE ROXBURY ARTS GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MUSIC OF STAMFORD N Y INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER HOSE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL AREA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC DBA HELIOS CARE ↗
- Who funds STAMFORD CHILDRENS ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF PEACE AND EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: A Lindsay & Olive B O'Connor Foundation Inc · Delaware National Bank of Delhi Corporate · United Way of North Central Mass Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Ma · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · The Tianaderrah Foundation (NY) · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Robert B & Addie P Thomson Trust 0000214 · Henry Heywood Memorial Hospital · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Stanley Penksa Foundation Inc · Dewar Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robinson-Broadhurst Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gaamha Inc — 58% of income from government
- Growing Places Garden Project Inc — 49% of income from government
- Community Health Connections Inc — 32% of income from government
- House of Peace and Education Inc — 29% of income from government
- Montachusett Veterans Outreach Center I — 17% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robinson-Broadhurst Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robinson-Broadhurst Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.