Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

Housing Conservation Coordinators

Housing Conservation Coordinators (New York) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $634,374 to it, the largest being CAMBA INC ($207,250). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$9.0M
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$634k
Net assets
$4.4M
8/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%
01What it does

What Housing Conservation Coordinators does

Mission

To help residents of manhattan's west side maintain affordable housing.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Housing services - provided legal assistance, community legal education programs and pro assistance to residents. During this fiscal year, HCC assisted 6,100 low income households in Manhattan, including full representation in 234 matters; in-depth advocacy to 75 households, and advice/counsel to 1,145 households; provided Community Legal Education benefitting 2,355 individuals, which included: tenant rights' education for 30 tenant associations (538 total attendees), community groups (69 total attendance), 90 tenant leaders, community workshops on various legal issues benefitting 300 community members, outreach to 1,358 individuals; Pro se workshops benefitting 342 attendees at HCC's 18th Annual West Side Tenant Conference, and 604 attendees through workshops and clinics, another 1,345 received Self-help printed materials; and referrals to legal and social service providers benefitting 2,799 families.

    $3,630,489 spent
    75% of program spending
  2. Weatherization installed in 159 units of low-income housing energy-efficient measures that included heating system distribution upgrades, energyefficient lighting retrofits, and ventilation shaft cleaning in compliance with ashare 62.2. Low-flow shower-heads, c/o and smoke detectors. There is required owner contributions. All materials that were installed were in compliance with the build america buy america act.

    $1,198,958 spent
    25% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,829,447.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.9M) Expenses 100 ($2.8M) Net assets 100 ($3.3M)2018 Revenue 120 ($3.5M) Expenses 120 ($3.4M) Net assets 78 ($2.6M)2019 Revenue 131 ($3.8M) Expenses 131 ($3.7M) Net assets 87 ($2.8M)2020 Revenue 136 ($4.0M) Expenses 142 ($4.0M) Net assets 89 ($2.9M)2021 Revenue 176 ($5.1M) Expenses 153 ($4.3M) Net assets 115 ($3.8M)2022 Revenue 190 ($5.5M) Expenses 181 ($5.1M) Net assets 112 ($3.7M)2023 Revenue 200 ($5.8M) Expenses 208 ($5.8M) Net assets 120 ($3.9M)2024 Revenue 309 ($9.0M) Expenses 308 ($8.6M) Net assets 134 ($4.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (309)Expenses (308)Net assets (134)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $6.9M to $8.9M (+30%).

$3.7M
$4.5M
$4.8M
$5.9M
$6.2M
$6.4M
$6.9M
$8.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 94% · 2018 93% · 2019 92% · 2020 92% · 2021 96% · 2022 93% · 2023 96% · 2024 95%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

96% of Housing Conservation Coordinators’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (93% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,392 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$96k
’17
$116k
’18
$136k
’19
−$38k
’20
$834k
’21
$416k
’22
−$41k
’23
$326k
’24
2.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2017201820192020202120222024
Listed79911101414
Joined·+3+1+2+0+4·
No longer listed·11010·
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $25k → $99k.

3 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Housing Conservation Coordinators’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Housing Conservation Coordinators leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

52% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Housing Conservation Coordinators.

33%
largest funder
70%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 48% · 2019 50% · 2020 32% · 2021 33% · 2022 43% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

57% of Housing Conservation Coordinators's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 89% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

94% of Housing Conservation Coordinators's grant income comes from New York funders.

NY
NJ

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $42k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Housing Conservation Coordinators has grown faster than half of the 1,337 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · below the median
Months of reserve2.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)17% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,337 crime & legal nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like Housing Conservation Coordinators

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 15%Fundraising 1%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Housing Conservation Coordinators: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Housing Conservation Coordinators?
Housing Conservation Coordinators (New York) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $634,374 to it, the largest being CAMBA INC ($207,250). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Housing Conservation Coordinators have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $634,374 in grants to Housing Conservation Coordinators, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Housing Conservation Coordinators?
CAMBA INC is the largest funder on record, with $207,250 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Housing Conservation Coordinators find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Housing Conservation Coordinators →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing