Skip to content

Montana · Public charity

Blackfoot Challenge Inc

The mission of The Blackfoot Challenge is to coordinate efforts that will conserve and enhance the natural resources and rural way of life in the Blackfoot Watershed for present and future generations.

$30k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
9
Organizations funded FY2020
11%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$22k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$22,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$22,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 9
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$6.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 11% of the organizations Blackfoot Challenge Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 11% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
EnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$22k100%
FY20209$88k11%
FY20197$60k0%
FY20188$110k100%
FY20172$104kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$357kCommunity Improvement$25kRecreation & Sports$22k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Big Blackfoot Chapter of Trout Unlimited Inc$78,963112%
Swan Valley Connections$35,00031%
Big Hole Watershed Committee Inc$34,45033%
Madison Valley Ranchlands Group$33,15037%
Centennial Valley Association Inc$33,00038%
Watershed Restoration Coalition for The$30,00033%
Granite Conservation District$28,0003n/a
Lincoln Heritage Alliance$25,0001n/a
Greater Yellowstone Coalition$22,50020%
Heart of the Rockies Initiative$10,00012%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($54k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Blackfoot Challenge Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Blackfoot Chapter of Trout Unlimited Inc: $78,963 over 1y, 12% of budgetSwan Valley Connections: $35,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBig Hole Watershed Committee Inc: $34,450 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMadison Valley Ranchlands Group: $33,150 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetCentennial Valley Association Inc: $33,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetWatershed Restoration Coalition for The: $30,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetGreater Yellowstone Coalition: $22,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHeart of the Rockies Initiative: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heart of the Rockies InitiativeMT17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heart of the Rockies Initiative · Patagoniaorg · The Vital Ground Foundation Inc · The Nature Conservancy · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Blackfoot Challenge Inc with peer funders

About Blackfoot Challenge Inc

How much does Blackfoot Challenge Inc give?
Blackfoot Challenge Inc reported 1 itemized grants totaling $22,000, out of $30,100 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Blackfoot Challenge Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (88%), Community Improvement (6%), Recreation & Sports (5%).
Who are Blackfoot Challenge Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Big Blackfoot Chapter of Trout Unlimited Inc ($79k), Swan Valley Connections ($35k), Big Hole Watershed Committee Inc ($34k).
Does Blackfoot Challenge Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Blackfoot Challenge Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Heart of the Rockies Initiative, Patagoniaorg, The Vital Ground Foundation Inc.
Where is Blackfoot Challenge Inc based?
Blackfoot Challenge Inc is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blackfoot Challenge’s filings →

More from the funding graph