Loading…
Loading…
Colorado · Nonprofit
The TRANSFORMATIVE FREEDOM FUND (Colorado) is funded by 9 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $52,273 in grants to it, the largest being THE COLORADO HEALTH FOUNDATION ($10,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
The TRANSFORMATIVE FREEDOM FUND runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 9,631 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,631 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2022
$10k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $15k and 2 in 2018.
5 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 66% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of The TRANSFORMATIVE FREEDOM FUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
The TRANSFORMATIVE FREEDOM FUND has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 55% · 2019 91% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 70% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
0% of The TRANSFORMATIVE FREEDOM FUND's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 22% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
The TRANSFORMATIVE FREEDOM FUND is locally rooted: 68% of its grant income comes from Colorado funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2022–2022), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing