Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES

THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES (Maryland) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $542,058 to it, the largest being INCLUSA FOUNDATION INC ($314,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$5.7M
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$542k
Net assets
$5.8M
1/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%
01What it does

What The Council on Quality & Leadership in Supports for People With Disabilities does

Mission

Cql was formed for the purpose of establishing and monitoring the accreditation standards to service providers for people with disabilities and to conduct research studies and educational programs to improve the quality of services for people with disabilities.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Accreditation and surveys - these services are grounded in our core values of person-directed supports and measures the direct impact of an organization's services on the lives of people supported. Cql accreditation is an objective, external measurement of service quality.

    $1,507,196 spent$2,369,182 earned by the program
    41% of program spending
  2. Special projects and program development - monitoring and evaluation projects are provided to large public and private human services systems to improve the quality of service provided to people with disabilities, people who are aging, and people with mental illness.

    $1,337,596 spent$1,675,460 earned by the program
    37% of program spending
  3. Workshops and conferences - workshops, training, consultation, and certification programs are grounded in person-centered values and principles. Cql offers practical solutions that address day-to-day challenges faced by service organizations.

    $795,553 spent$280,441 earned by the program
    22% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,640,345.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.9M) Expenses 100 ($3.8M) Net assets 100 ($4.3M)2018 Revenue 95 ($3.7M) Expenses 94 ($3.6M) Net assets 92 ($3.9M)2019 Revenue 90 ($3.5M) Expenses 96 ($3.7M) Net assets 98 ($4.2M)2020 Revenue 55 ($2.1M) Expenses 66 ($2.5M) Net assets 91 ($3.9M)2021 Revenue 91 ($3.5M) Expenses 70 ($2.7M) Net assets 114 ($4.9M)2022 Revenue 115 ($4.5M) Expenses 115 ($4.4M) Net assets 100 ($4.2M)2023 Revenue 125 ($4.8M) Expenses 123 ($4.7M) Net assets 110 ($4.7M)2024 Revenue 146 ($5.7M) Expenses 124 ($4.8M) Net assets 135 ($5.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (146)Expenses (124)Net assets (135)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $5.3M to $6.4M (+20%).

$4.6M
$4.2M
$4.6M
$4.6M
$5.4M
$4.8M
$5.3M
$6.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 4% · 2018 3% · 2021 20% · 2023 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$34k
’17
$67k
’18
−$190k
’19
−$420k
’20
$832k
’21
$45k
’22
$97k
’23
$902k
’24
0.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Mary Mann

President & CEO

Board chair

Desiree Loucks-Baer

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019, and between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1919181717182220
Joined·+2+2+5+4+4+6+4
No longer listed·2364326
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $42 → $27.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$106k
funders
1
1
2
1
2
1

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

82% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.

58%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland, across 4 states in all.

WI
PA
CA
DE

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $141 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 23%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

85%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

IL
NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES?
THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES (Maryland) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $542,058 to it, the largest being INCLUSA FOUNDATION INC ($314,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $542,058 in grants to THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES?
INCLUSA FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $314,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Council on Quality & Leadership in Supports for People With Disabilities →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing