Colorado · Nonprofit
TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE
TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $61,738 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($34,213). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE has grown faster than three-quarters of the 14,524 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,524 arts & culture nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- La Plata Electric Association Inclocal
- Feeding South Dakotaportfolio match
- Arizona Food Bank Networkportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (78% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $2k → $44k.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 55% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2022 53% · 2023 55% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
55% of TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $28k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Colorado funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $34k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- La Plata Electric Association InclocalCO · funds 8 organizations near you
- Feeding South Dakotaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arizona Food Bank Networkportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Kai Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Community Food Bank Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lacygoldenstein Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arizona Humanities Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Catholic Charities of Northern Nevadaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizonaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- St Mary's Food Bank Allianceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Northern New Mexico Serving Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Coportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Three Squareportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Colorado
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE?
- TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $61,738 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($34,213). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $61,738 in grants to TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE?
- Schwab Charitable Fund is the largest funder on record, with $34,213 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like TARA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NAVAJO LAKE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing