Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG (Virginia) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,454 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ($25,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 87% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$308k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$45k
Net assets
$3.7M
4/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Petersburg does

Mission

Our goal is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the two cities and adjoining areas," according to the by-laws of the spca of petersburg and colonial heights, va. In order to do this, we: * provide a place for people to report suspected cruelty or need for intervention. We follow up on reports of cruelty or distress by working with city or county police. We address other measures, such as the need for new laws, affecting the welfare of all animals. * provide low-cost spay and neuter assistance in cooperation with area veterinarians to prevent a surplus of animals that would otherwise be destroyed. * provide medical assistance for treatment of ill or injured animals where suffering or death would occur, on a case-by-case basis. * participate in activities to find homes for adoptable shelter animals and work with other organizations toward that common goal. * provide trap rental and instruction to aid individuals in the trap

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The spca of petersburg and colonial heights handled in excess of 2,900 calls from the public in 2024. Additional calls were received and handled by volunteers after office hours. The area of service included: colonial heights, petersburg, chesterfield, dinwiddie, prince george, hopewell, ft. Lee and others. The majority of calls were for spay/neuter assistance which totaled 1,448. Information calls: 640medical certificates: 656medical assistance: 172 other calls were related to wanted animals, available animals, lost and found pets, trap rental, donations, and cruelty and distress matters.the top three expense items for 2025:veterinarian bills: the cost of spaying and neutering, assisting with medical expenses that are beyond pet owner's capability such as heartworm treatment which runs in excess of $600, spca pays a portion. Spca has a program worked out with area veterinarians to provide medical exams for newly adopted pets. These exams would otherwise cost the pet owner in excess of $35.00. Other assistance is given for x-rays, broken bones, surgery, etc.investment management fees:the second largest expense was investment management fees for investments held by the…

    $101,811 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $101,811.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($94k) Expenses 100 ($122k) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2018 Revenue 344 ($323k) Expenses 71 ($86k) Net assets 106 ($2.6M)2019 Revenue 190 ($179k) Expenses 74 ($89k) Net assets 118 ($2.9M)2020 Revenue 200 ($188k) Expenses 63 ($77k) Net assets 124 ($3.0M)2021 Revenue 234 ($220k) Expenses 82 ($100k) Net assets 134 ($3.3M)2022 Revenue 152 ($143k) Expenses 92 ($112k) Net assets 123 ($3.0M)2023 Revenue 270 ($254k) Expenses 100 ($122k) Net assets 133 ($3.2M)2024 Revenue 362 ($340k) Expenses 106 ($129k) Net assets 142 ($3.5M)2025 Revenue 328 ($308k) Expenses 98 ($119k) Net assets 152 ($3.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (328)Expenses (98)Net assets (152)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $2.6M to $2.9M (+12%).

$2.4M
$2.6M
$2.9M
$3.0M
$3.3M
$3.0M
$3.2M
$3.5M
$3.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

36% of SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$28k
’17
$237k
’18
$89k
’19
$111k
’20
$120k
’21
$31k
’22
$133k
’23
$212k
’24
$189k
’25
88
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed181818151515141412
Joined·+2+1+0+1+3+0+0+0
No longer listed·21313102
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $250 → $32k.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 87% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

87% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG.

55%
largest funder
91%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 80% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 51% · 2021 63% · 2022 84% · 2023 78% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

87% of SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $6k that is directly attributable, 70% of it comes from Virginia funders.

VA
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $40k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,693 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin61% · top quartile
Months of reserve88.2mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 12%Fundraising 3%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

31%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

VA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG?
SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG (Virginia) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,454 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ($25,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 87% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $45,454 in grants to SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG?
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PETERSBURG find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing