Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Washington · Nonprofit

SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED

SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED (Washington) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $56,684 to it, the largest being RIVERSTYX FOUNDATION ($39,725). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$211k
Revenue FY2025
5
Funders on record
$57k
Grants received
$338k
Net assets
4/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 20%

Against its field

SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,307 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin62% · top quartile
Months of reserve49.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)22% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,307 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($53k) Expenses 100 ($39k) Net assets 100 ($55k)2019 Revenue 102 ($54k) Expenses 66 ($26k) Net assets 160 ($88k)2020 Revenue 94 ($49k) Expenses 50 ($19k) Net assets 214 ($119k)2021 Revenue 113 ($60k) Expenses 69 ($27k) Net assets 273 ($151k)2022 Revenue 146 ($77k) Expenses 169 ($66k) Net assets 293 ($162k)2023 Revenue 241 ($127k) Expenses 206 ($80k) Net assets 377 ($209k)2024 Revenue 209 ($110k) Expenses 291 ($113k) Net assets 372 ($206k)2025 Revenue 402 ($211k) Expenses 205 ($80k) Net assets 610 ($338k)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (402)Expenses (205)Net assets (610)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

93% of SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,013 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$14k
18
$28k
19
$30k
20
$33k
21
$11k
22
$47k
23
$3k
24
$132k
25
49
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $5k → $10k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)29% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

29% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED.

70%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 97% · 2021 95% · 2022 97% · 2023 97%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

99% of SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
NY
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
20
21
23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 300 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 7%Fundraising 1%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

65%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED?
SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED (Washington) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $56,684 to it, the largest being RIVERSTYX FOUNDATION ($39,725). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $56,684 in grants to SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED?
RIVERSTYX FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $39,725 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SKAGIT ANIMALS IN NEED find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing