Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL

SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL (Texas) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $257,114 to it, the largest being Permanent Endowment Fund of Moody Methodist Church ($182,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$735k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$257k
Net assets
$94k
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 16%
01What it does

What Samaritan Women at the Well does

Mission

Providing emergency shelter to long-term housing with holistic care services and programs to homeless individuals and their children ware are in need of crisis intervention and advocacy through referrals, coordination and collaboraton with other community service providers

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Program service accomplishements - swatw servies adult homeless men, women/ women with children who are victims affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, substance abuse, incarceration, hiv and other violent crimes or crises. We endeavor to remove barriers to restoration, empower them to move forward with their lives, equip them to achieve and sustain positive lifestyles to become productive, self-sufficient citizens. Programs include no-cost emergency and long-term shelter up to 18 months, individualized case management, victim specific counseling, licensed therapy, legal assistance/advocacy, collaborative and coordinated referrals to other community service providers, social service advocacy, employment assistance, permanent housing placements with rent and utility deposit payments, child care and client transportation while targeting the clients personal development, financial stability and permanent housing needs. Program elements are designed to end negative life-cycles.

    $617,136 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $617,136.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($431k) Expenses 100 ($431k) Net assets 0 ($0)2021 Revenue 135 ($583k) Expenses 127 ($548k) Net assets 100 ($35k)2022 Revenue 203 ($875k) Expenses 183 ($788k) Net assets 382 ($133k)2023 Revenue 224 ($964k) Expenses 253 ($1.1M) Net assets 353 ($123k)2024 Revenue 170 ($735k) Expenses 177 ($763k) Net assets 271 ($94k)
20202021202220232024
Revenue (170)Expenses (177)Net assets (271)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $555k to $133k (−76%).

$374k
$555k
$133k
$123k
$94k
20202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 67% · 2021 81% · 2023 77% · 2024 47%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (37% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,334 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$0
’20
$35k
’21
$88k
’22
−$124k
’23
−$29k
’24
0.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Doris Jones

Executive director

Board chair

Tiffany Ward

Board chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

20202021202220232024
Listed1514151312
Joined·+2+5+1+0
No longer listed·3431
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $35k → $46k.

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

75% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL.

71%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 64% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL's grant income comes from Texas funders.

TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $64 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL has grown faster than three-quarters of the 7,828 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−4% · below the median
Months of reserve0.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,828 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $519k on record.

Federal$519k
grants $519kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$519k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 19%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL?
SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL (Texas) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $257,114 to it, the largest being Permanent Endowment Fund of Moody Methodist Church ($182,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $257,114 in grants to SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL?
Permanent Endowment Fund of Moody Methodist Church is the largest funder on record, with $182,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SAMARITAN WOMEN AT THE WELL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Samaritan Women at the Well →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing