Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Alabama · Nonprofit

RIVER REGION TRAILS INC

RIVER REGION TRAILS INC (Alabama) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $110,700 to it, the largest being MIKE AND GILLIAN GOODRICH FOUNDATION ($70,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$209k
Revenue FY2025
6
Funders on record
$111k
Grants received
$156k
Net assets
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 18%

Against its field

RIVER REGION TRAILS INC has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,156 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin8% · below the median
Months of reserve7.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)216% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,156 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($21) Expenses 100 ($250) Net assets 100 ($14k)2018 Expenses 40 ($100) Net assets 99 ($14k)2019 Expenses 40 ($100) Net assets 99 ($14k)2020 Revenue 539686 ($113k) Expenses 60445 ($151k) Net assets 112 ($16k)2021 Revenue 2381667 ($500k) Expenses 99756 ($249k) Net assets 1892 ($266k)2022 Revenue 1454762 ($306k) Expenses 121248 ($303k) Net assets 1909 ($269k)2023 Revenue 258224 ($54k) Expenses 75086 ($188k) Net assets 961 ($135k)2024 Revenue 525062 ($110k) Expenses 37654 ($94k) Net assets 988 ($139k)2025 Revenue 993252 ($209k) Expenses 76646 ($192k) Net assets 1109 ($156k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (993252)Expenses (76646)Net assets (1109)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 47% · 2022 46% · 2025 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

101% of RIVER REGION TRAILS INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,616 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$229
17
$100
18
$100
19
$38k
20
$251k
21
$2k
22
$133k
23
$16k
24
$17k
25
7.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $20k → $10k.

1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $35k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Alabama Power Foundation Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money RIVER REGION TRAILS INC raised.

From the IRS filings of RIVER REGION TRAILS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RIVER REGION TRAILS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

63%
largest funder
86%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 58% · 2022 68% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

92% of RIVER REGION TRAILS INC's grant income comes from Alabama funders.

DC
AL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
21
22
23
Alabama out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 354 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like RIVER REGION TRAILS INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alabama

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

70%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RIVER REGION TRAILS INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RIVER REGION TRAILS INC?
RIVER REGION TRAILS INC (Alabama) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $110,700 to it, the largest being MIKE AND GILLIAN GOODRICH FOUNDATION ($70,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RIVER REGION TRAILS INC have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $110,700 in grants to RIVER REGION TRAILS INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RIVER REGION TRAILS INC?
MIKE AND GILLIAN GOODRICH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $70,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RIVER REGION TRAILS INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alabama. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing