Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Michigan · Nonprofit

RETURNING THE FAVOR

RETURNING THE FAVOR (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,000 to it, the largest being Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund ($10,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$21k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$14k
Grants received
$4k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 34%

Against its field

RETURNING THE FAVOR has grown faster than three-quarters of the 629 unclassified nonprofits its size.

Operating margin17% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 629 unclassified nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($8k) Expenses 100 ($7k) Net assets 100 ($447)2019 Revenue 243 ($19k) Expenses 191 ($14k) Net assets 1785 ($8k)2020 Revenue 496 ($38k) Expenses 377 ($27k) Net assets 4221 ($19k)2021 Revenue 400 ($31k) Expenses 397 ($29k) Net assets 4670 ($21k)2022 Revenue 497 ($39k) Expenses 722 ($53k) Net assets 1498 ($7k)2023 Revenue 278 ($22k) Expenses 379 ($28k) Net assets 3298 ($15k)2024 Revenue 273 ($21k) Expenses 179 ($13k) Net assets 1807 ($8k)2025 Revenue 277 ($21k) Expenses 244 ($18k) Net assets 807 ($4k)
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (277)Expenses (244)Net assets (807)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of RETURNING THE FAVOR’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,274 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$447
17
$5k
19
$11k
20
$2k
21
$14k
22
$6k
23
$8k
24
$4k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)75% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RETURNING THE FAVOR’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RETURNING THE FAVOR leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

75% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RETURNING THE FAVOR.

75%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

75% of RETURNING THE FAVOR's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $4k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Michigan, across 1 state.

MO

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $11k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like RETURNING THE FAVOR

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RETURNING THE FAVOR: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RETURNING THE FAVOR?
RETURNING THE FAVOR (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,000 to it, the largest being Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund ($10,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does RETURNING THE FAVOR have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $14,000 in grants to RETURNING THE FAVOR.
Who is the largest funder of RETURNING THE FAVOR?
Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund is the largest funder on record, with $10,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RETURNING THE FAVOR find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing