· Public charity
The Bowlers to Veterans Link
THE BOWLERS TO VETERANS LINK provides recreational and therapeutic programs and services for active duty and veterans to boost morale and speed recuperation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 49 grants below total $961,186 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,260,517 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $299,331 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $142k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $442k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $377k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MYND VR INC | $216,200 |
| PATRIOT POINT LLC | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $60,538 |
| VFW POST 720 | $32,500 |
| PENNSYLVANIA SOLDIERS' & SAILORS' HOME | $27,191 |
| RICHMOND VAMC | $25,650 |
| SITTER & BARFOOT VETS CARE CENTER | $25,600 |
| ARIZONA STATE VETERANS HOME | $24,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $21,577 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| GV SONNY MONTGOMERY VAMC | $18,810 |
| VA SIERRA NEVADA HCS | $18,050 |
| BATTERY WAREHOUSE & BATTERY GIANT | $18,000 |
| SERVICE DOGS FOR VETERANS | $16,821 |
| PAWS OF WAR-NORTH CAROLINA | $16,821 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
82 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $306k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- USUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE3× · 2023–2025 · $42k · revenue +8%
- VDVETERANS DROP-IN CENTER3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +25%
- SDSERVICE DOGS FOR VETERANS2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- RVROUDEBUSH VAMCone grant, 2023 · $51k
- HBHOME BASE SWFLone grant, 2021 · $30k
- HFHONOR FLIGHT OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
to assist veterans in obtaining service animals
Veterans hunting-fishing trips and other verterans activities
Service dogs for disabled veterans
Provide and train service dogs for disabled service member and/or veterans
Service Dog training for Disabled Veterans
Providing service dogs to veterans and first responders
Supplying service dogs to verterans with post traumatic stress disorder.
Provide service dogs to us military veterans
To take eligible veterans to dc.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Veterans Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Central Florida Warriors Hocke. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 183 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Bible Society · Fisher House Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bowlers to Veterans Link funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Bowlers to Veterans Link?
Find your warmest path to The Bowlers to Veterans Link through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.