Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Wisconsin VFW Foundation Inc

To facilitate the charitable, patriotic and educational activities of the membership of the veterans of foreign wars-department of wisconsin.

$263k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$2.3MAnimals$630kPublic Benefit$447kArts & Culture$31kEducation$30kEmployment$30kHousing & Shelter$27kRecreation & Sports$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $207,641 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $263,423 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,782 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$772k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE US DEPT OF WISCONSIN 2260$50,000
WM SONNY SIMON VFW POST 8216$35,000
VFW POST 1318$34,757
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN$25,000
MT HOREB VFW POST 9511$16,000
WISCONSIN VETERANS NETWORK INC$10,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN$10,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE US DEPT OF WISCONSIN$10,000
DEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE US$9,884
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SIERRA DELTA INC: $18k → 9%WALKIN IN MY SHOES INC: $6k → 10%STABLE HANDS INC: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 8 repeat orgs$499k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$3.0M
$397k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-11%

Still filing today

63%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    veterans of foreign wars of the 1318 marion c
    6× · 2019–2025 · $176k · revenue +159% · 58% of their budget
  • DO
    DEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES
    4× · 2019–2025 · $148k · revenue +19%
  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN
    5× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +125% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS-POST 10818
    one grant, 2023 · $51k · revenue -91%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 6461

Veterans affairs

2
Veterans of Foreign Wars

The vfw has been supporting and honoring the military veterans and their families since 1914.

3
Veterans Foreign Wars

To support Veterans of Foreign Wats per national charter

4
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the Us Dept of Mt

Service officers for filing and managing va claims. to assist the posts in providing services to members and their families for veterans of foreign wars.

Public Benefit
5
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Department of Ohio

Support of veterans

6
Veterans of Foreign Wars Department

To support all veterans and the community

7
Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 3213

Veteran organization dedicated to servering local community needs and veterans needs through volunteer grants donations and scholarships

8
N Las Vegas Memorial Post Number 10047 Veterans of

To provide a meeting place for veterans

9
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Dept of Wi 7591 Post

Provide aid to veterans.

10
Veterans of Foreign Wars Department of Wyoming

Assist disabled and needy veterans.

11
Veterans of Foreign Wars Post #1672

Veterans of all our armed services a place to congregate

12
Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 2329

To foster camaraderie among United States veterans of overseas conflicts. To serve our veterans, the military, and our communities. To advocate on behalf of all veterans. The Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States is a nonprofit…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Department of Wisconsin of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States and the most unlike its peers is Walkin in My Shoes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%10%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr16%67%35–55yr18%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr16%97%35–55yr18%1%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
9%
1,594/16,885

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
4/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES — $1,835,463 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATESVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN — $662,775 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSINveterans of foreign wars of the 1318 marion c — $176,450 · OtherDEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES — $148,370 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN — $124,609 · Other+15 more — $490,978 · Other+15 moreSIERRA DELTA INC — $18,179 · Human ServicesSTABLE HANDS INC — $6,719 · Human ServicesWALKIN IN MY SHOES INC — $6,150 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $30,363 · EducationCenter for Veterans Issues Inc — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterWISCONSIN VETERANS NETWORK INC — $10,000 · Public BenefitTRINITY EQUESTRIAN CENTER KIDS KAMP INC — $6,719 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,438,645Human Services$31,048Education$30,363Housing & Shelter$15,000Public Benefit$10,000Recreation & Sports$6,719

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES — $1,835,463 over 2y, 86% of budgetveterans of foreign wars of the 1318 marion c — $176,450 over 6y, 58% of budgetDEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES — $148,370 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF WISCONSIN — $75,000 over 5y, 42% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS-POST 10818 — $50,725 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetVeterans of Foreign Wars 2260 — $50,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetMT HOREB VFW POST 9511 — $44,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $30,363 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 328 — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 6375 — $25,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetSIERRA DELTA INC — $18,179 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCenter for Veterans Issues Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWISCONSIN VETERANS NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSTABLE HANDS INC — $6,719 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRINITY EQUESTRIAN CENTER KIDS KAMP INC — $6,719 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWALKIN IN MY SHOES INC — $6,150 over 1y, 6.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wisconsin VFW Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wisconsin VFW Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wisconsin VFW Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph