New York · Nonprofit
Resilience Advocacy Project
Resilience Advocacy Project (New York) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $520,185 to it, the largest being THE ROGER I & RUTH B MACFARLANE FNDN ($150,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2017
- $405k
- Funders on record
- 14
- Grants received
- $520k
- Net assets
- $292k
What Resilience Advocacy Project does
Mission
RAP develops and implements innovative youth
As stated on its FY2017 Form 990.
Program
Youth leadership programming rap's youth leadership programs are leadership and peer advocacy training programs that train youth to identify social justice and health issues that they are passionate about and to become peer advocates in their communities through the design and launch of innovative community impact projects.
The first program described on its most recent Form 990, which lists programs largest first by expense.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2021: the base narrowed from 9 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $371k → $106.
2 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 17% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Resilience Advocacy Project’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Resilience Advocacy Project leans on a few funders — its largest provides 29% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
45% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Resilience Advocacy Project.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 40% · 2018 53% · 2019 55% · 2020 90% · 2021 94% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
0% of Resilience Advocacy Project's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 36% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2021, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
56% of Resilience Advocacy Project's grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $90k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like Resilience Advocacy Project
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In New York
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
71% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
83%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Resilience Advocacy Project: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Resilience Advocacy Project?
- Resilience Advocacy Project (New York) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $520,185 to it, the largest being THE ROGER I & RUTH B MACFARLANE FNDN ($150,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Resilience Advocacy Project have?
- IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $520,185 in grants to Resilience Advocacy Project, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Resilience Advocacy Project?
- THE ROGER I & RUTH B MACFARLANE FNDN is the largest funder on record, with $150,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Resilience Advocacy Project find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Resilience Advocacy Project →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2017 (financials across 2017–2017), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing