Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

Recovery for the City

Recovery for the City (Virginia) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $576,265 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($203,500). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$382k
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$576k
Net assets
$423k
12/18 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%
01What it does

What Recovery for the City does

Mission

Individuals struggling with addictions and compulsive behaviors. The organization provides preventative programs for the whole family, including adults, teens and children as well as community awareness.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Individual and group counseling sessions provided by a certified interventionist are provided to program participants regardless of their ability to pay. The organization conducted an average of 30 counseling sessions per week.

    $357,667 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $357,667.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($371k) Expenses 100 ($287k) Net assets 100 ($322k)2018 Revenue 126 ($469k) Expenses 175 ($501k) Net assets 89 ($286k)2019 Revenue 137 ($510k) Expenses 192 ($550k) Net assets 77 ($247k)2020 Revenue 155 ($576k) Expenses 173 ($497k) Net assets 101 ($326k)2021 Revenue 146 ($541k) Expenses 189 ($541k) Net assets 101 ($325k)2022 Revenue 180 ($668k) Expenses 178 ($509k) Net assets 151 ($485k)2023 Revenue 152 ($563k) Expenses 233 ($667k) Net assets 118 ($381k)2024 Revenue 103 ($382k) Expenses 120 ($343k) Net assets 131 ($423k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (103)Expenses (120)Net assets (131)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $248k to $1.2M (+376%).

$322k
$286k
$248k
$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.3M
$1.2M
$1.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

39% of Recovery for the City’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,932 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$84k
’17
−$32k
’18
−$40k
’19
$78k
’20
−$791
’21
$158k
’22
−$104k
’23
$39k
’24
18
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Jeff Harline

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1111111212121212
Joined·+0+0+10+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·0090000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 6 funders, grant income rose $60k → $100k.

4 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Recovery for the City’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 17 of 18 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Recovery for the City has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 35% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

79% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Recovery for the City.

35%
largest funder
58%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 44% · 2018 62% · 2019 89% · 2020 90% · 2021 40% · 2022 36% · 2023 51% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of Recovery for the City's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

51% of Recovery for the City's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $283k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Virginia funders.

IL
VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $293k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Recovery for the City holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 13,769 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin10% · above the median
Months of reserve17.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,769 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like Recovery for the City

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 17%Fundraising 14%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Recovery for the City: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Recovery for the City?
Recovery for the City (Virginia) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $576,265 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($203,500). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Recovery for the City have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $576,265 in grants to Recovery for the City, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Recovery for the City?
NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $203,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Recovery for the City find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Recovery for the City →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing