Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG
REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $194,292 to it, the largest being REBUILDING TOGETHER INC ($119,225). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 4,472 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,472 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Kenneth Bankert Foundation Incshared funderslocalportfolio match
- United Way of the Capital Regionshared funderslocal
- Habitat for Humanity South Carolinaportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (37% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $16k → $11.
3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 0% · 2022 45% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG draws 83% of its grant income from funders outside Pennsylvania, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $50k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Kenneth Bankert Foundation Incshared funderslocalportfolio matchPA · backs 25 organizations that share your funders · funds 25 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of the Capital Regionshared funderslocalPA · backs 80 organizations that share your funders · funds 107 organizations near you
- Habitat for Humanity South Carolinaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Yuba-Sutter-Colusa United Wayportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Housing Assistance Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Republic Services Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Habitat for Humanity of Ohio Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Habitat For Humanity Virginiaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Westmoreland Human Services Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Community Affordable Housing Equity Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Good News Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG?
- REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $194,292 to it, the largest being REBUILDING TOGETHER INC ($119,225). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $194,292 in grants to REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG?
- REBUILDING TOGETHER INC is the largest funder on record, with $119,225 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER HARRISBURG find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing