Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

PROJECT MAANA

PROJECT MAANA (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,936 to it, the largest being THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ($35,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 76% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.1M
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$93k
Net assets
$1.4M
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 6%
01What it does

What Project Maana does

Mission

Project Maana exists to share the gospel and help break the cycle of poverty by investing in impoverished children, their families and communities through clean water, nutrition, education, and discipling projects.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Project Maana achieves its goals through individual and corporate donations, child sponsorships, and short-term mission trips. Short-term mission trips allow Project Maana's supporters a first-hand opportunity to serve and experience all of the blessings that Project Maana is able to deliver to extremely impoverished children and their families through their support. Project Maana also focuses on the continuous development of its staff, partners, and volunteers by attending (and hosting) conferences and training workshops.

    $358,684 spent
    41% of program spending
  2. Education project - san pablo, dominican republic: during the 2024/2025 school year, Project Maana's private school provided an education to 210 children; grades: pre-k through 8th. During the 2025/2026 school year, Project Maana's private school provided an education to 142 children; grades: pre-k through 9th grade.cienfuegos, dominican republic: in 2025, Project Maana's community center offered after-school tutoring to 114 impoverished children, five days per week.

    $265,110 spent
    30% of program spending
  3. Prison project - in 2025, Project Maana's "institute for authentic manhood/womanhood"(tm) graduated 950 people (inmates, prison staff, and government officials). Of the total inmate graduates, many made the decision to receive jesus christ as their savior and were baptized by Project Maana inside the prison. As of december 31, 2025, Project Maana serves in 20 men's and 3 women's prisons in the dominican republic.timothy project - in 2025, the evangelical church that Project Maana launched in 2015 continues to thrive. Additionally, the timothy project provided benevolent gifts to impoverished people for medical services, school scholarships, groceries, and more. In june 2024, construction was completed on a new church & dormitory building.

    $98,536 spent
    11% of program spending
  4. Local partner support

    $88,423 spent
    10% of program spending
  5. Nutrition project - in 2025,Project Maana provided nutritious meals to an average of 418 impoverished children, five days per week.clean water project - in 2025, Project Maana's cumulative total of clean water filters distributed reached 1,389, providing a total of 76 million gallons of clean water annually to extremely impoverished families.

    $71,833 spent
    8% of program spending
  6. Princess project - designed to provide impoverished girls with the opportunity to experience a quinceanera. Each girl is lent a beautiful dress to wear. In addition, she is gifted with a tiara and all her accessories to make her celebration very special. Then, Project Maana's team will plan an amazing celebration (with cake, photos, and decorations) together with the princess's family and friends. All princess project participants attend a multi-class program which teaches biblical womanhood and healthy maturity. In 2025, the cumulative total of girls who completed the princess project reached 63.

    $371 spent
    0% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $882,957.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($578k) Expenses 100 ($483k) Net assets 100 ($377k)2018 Revenue 116 ($672k) Expenses 117 ($568k) Net assets 128 ($481k)2019 Revenue 102 ($588k) Expenses 109 ($527k) Net assets 144 ($543k)2020 Revenue 91 ($523k) Expenses 94 ($454k) Net assets 162 ($612k)2021 Revenue 136 ($784k) Expenses 115 ($554k) Net assets 223 ($842k)2022 Revenue 150 ($867k) Expenses 136 ($659k) Net assets 279 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 180 ($1.0M) Expenses 191 ($924k) Net assets 309 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 192 ($1.1M) Expenses 209 ($1.0M) Net assets 335 ($1.3M)2025 Revenue 190 ($1.1M) Expenses 207 ($1.0M) Net assets 362 ($1.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (190)Expenses (207)Net assets (362)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $619k to $875k (+41%).

$383k
$484k
$549k
$619k
$875k
$1.1M
$1.2M
$1.3M
$1.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

29% of PROJECT MAANA’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,679 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$94k
’17
$105k
’18
$62k
’19
$68k
’20
$230k
’21
$209k
’22
$115k
’23
$98k
’24
$99k
’25
3.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Nebraska Berman

Executive director

Board chair

Daniel Mcswain

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed555677777
Joined·+0+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
No longer listed·00000100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $35k → $11k.

4 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 77% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT MAANA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT MAANA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 74%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

76% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROJECT MAANA.

38%
largest funder
74%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2020 65% · 2021 57% · 2022 70% · 2023 95% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

76% of PROJECT MAANA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $22k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside California, across 3 states.

MI
NJ
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $71k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PROJECT MAANA runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 718 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin9% · above the median
Months of reserve3.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 718 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like PROJECT MAANA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
71%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT MAANA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT MAANA?
PROJECT MAANA (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,936 to it, the largest being THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ($35,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 76% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PROJECT MAANA have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $92,936 in grants to PROJECT MAANA, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT MAANA?
THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $35,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT MAANA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Project Maana →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing