Skip to content

New Hampshire · Nonprofit

PROJECT HOME

PROJECT HOME (New Hampshire) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $158,808 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($31,408). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$121k
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$159k
Net assets
$83k
4/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 58%
01What it does

What Project Home does

Mission

Project Home shall function to bring asylum seekers into homes within local communities as they go through the asylum-seeking process. Project Home shall work with local families to provide housing for asylum seekers. It shall further work to support asylum seekers with legal, medical, educational and any other services necessary to their asylum case and to their well-being. The purpose shall be to create a community-based model in the Monadnock Region of New Hampshire and to develop a coalition of organizations that support this work. This may serve as the foundation for replicating this model across New Hampshire, and eventually across the nation.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Goal: Hosting and support for asylum seekers in our local communities as they pursue their asylum cases. In 2024, we supported six families or individuals who are seeking asylum, totaling 8 adults and 10 children. Most were provided with housing, food, phone, clothing, health care and legal representation. Children were enrolled in school and summer programs. Adults were enrolled in English classes and vocational education as appropriate. As needed, we provided transportation, tutoring, translation, and many other needs.

    $93,966 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $93,966.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($57k) Expenses 100 ($27k) Net assets 100 ($34k)2021 Revenue 141 ($80k) Expenses 219 ($59k) Net assets 158 ($54k)2022 Revenue 138 ($79k) Expenses 215 ($58k) Net assets 219 ($74k)2023 Revenue 84 ($48k) Expenses 310 ($83k) Net assets 114 ($39k)2024 Revenue 263 ($149k) Expenses 451 ($121k) Net assets 196 ($67k)2025 Revenue 214 ($121k) Expenses 391 ($105k) Net assets 243 ($83k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (214)Expenses (391)Net assets (243)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $53k to $79k (+48%).

$34k
$54k
$74k
$53k
$79k
$83k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of PROJECT HOME’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$30k
’20
$21k
’21
$21k
’22
−$36k
’23
$28k
’24
$16k
’25
15
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $5k → $28k.

5 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT HOME’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT HOME has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

76% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROJECT HOME.

20%
largest funder
56%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 57% · 2022 39% · 2023 60% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of PROJECT HOME's funders are still giving 1 year after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

67% of PROJECT HOME's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $53k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside New Hampshire, across 2 states.

PA
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
New Hampshire out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $106k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PROJECT HOME runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin13% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like PROJECT HOME

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New Hampshire

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT HOME: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT HOME?
PROJECT HOME (New Hampshire) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $158,808 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($31,408). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PROJECT HOME have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $158,808 in grants to PROJECT HOME, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT HOME?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $31,408 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT HOME find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New Hampshire. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Project Home →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing