Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Physicians Medical Forum

Physicians Medical Forum (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,180,956 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA WELLNESS FOUNDATION ($580,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$86k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$1.2M
Net assets
$274k
2/5 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Physicians Medical Forum does

Mission

To promote and inspire education, training and resource development that support physician recruitment and retention; to encourage individuals from diverse and social backgrounds to pursue careers in medicine; and to provide the infrastructure and support needed for their success, with the goal of reducing health disparities and improving healthcare equity and medical care throughout Northern California and the Bay Area.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The Physicians Medical Forum (PMF) Doctors on Board Program (DOB) and Initiatives encourages and supports students who aspire to become doctors. The pipline of students are high school, college/university, community college and post baccalaureate students who want to become physicians. The program provides studens with mentoring and networking opportunities. Students also receive information on taking SAT/ACT exams, MCAT prep medical school applications financial aid, internships, mock primary & surgery clinics, workshops on writing personal statements, interviewing and skill building sessions. High School students also network and are mentored by medical students, residents, physicians, educator and community mentors. PMF also provides scholarships, stipends and other access to finacial resources, networks and mentoring to medical students and residents. Additionally, PMF engages in programs and initiatives with physicians and educators on health policy and community wellness.

    $30,956 spentof which $2,850 as grants
    26% of program spending
  2. Encourage/recruit residents and medical students that upon their completion of their medical education, residency and fellowship training, to pursue careers as physicians in the Alameda, Contra Costa or San Francisco counties and Northern CA and the Bay Area.

    $0 spent$109 earned by the program
    0% of program spending
  3. To maintain core business and strategic paractices, outreach, education and fund development to support the organizations vision, mission, goals and strategies to encourage individuals from diverse and social backgrounds in their journey through high school, college/university, medical shcool, residency, fellowships to pursing careers to become physicians in Alameda, Contra Costa and San Francisco counties and Northern CA and the Bay Area.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  4. 1. Increased the outreach, education, scholarships and mentoring encouraging diverse and socially adverse backgrounds interested in medicine and becoming doctors. 2. Updated databases - schools, colleges/university, medical schools, associations, health organizations prep support that encourages and prepares students

    $87,886 spentof which $2,850 as grants
    74% of program spending
  5. and physicians for their careers as physicians in all sectors. 3. Partnering with medical schools, medical associations, nonprofit organizations, colleges, universities, high schools and educational institutions- along with exam preparation companies, associations of medical colleges, student medical organizations, high school counselors and educators, physician associations, and other

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  6. community resources - to provide students with mentoring, coaching, SAT, ACT and MCAT preparation, academic guidance, and careeer development support.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $118,842.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($233k) Expenses 100 ($249k) Net assets 0 ($0)2018 Revenue 49 ($115k) Expenses 101 ($251k) Net assets 0 ($0)2019 Revenue 133 ($310k) Expenses 112 ($278k) Net assets 0 ($0)2020 Revenue 0 ($0) Expenses 72 ($180k) Net assets 100 ($153k)2021 Revenue 49 ($115k) Expenses 59 ($147k) Net assets 153 ($234k)2022 Revenue 158 ($369k) Expenses 139 ($346k) Net assets 95 ($145k)2023 Revenue 134 ($313k) Expenses 81 ($202k) Net assets 688 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 88 ($205k) Expenses 102 ($254k) Net assets 236 ($361k)2025 Revenue 37 ($86k) Expenses 74 ($184k) Net assets 179 ($274k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (37)Expenses (74)Net assets (179)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $145k to $438k (+202%).

$0
$0
$0
$153k
$234k
$145k
$438k
$379k
$275k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 95% · 2022 25%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of Physicians Medical Forum’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,214 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$16k
’17
−$136k
’18
$32k
’19
−$180k
’20
−$31k
’21
$22k
’22
$111k
’23
−$49k
’24
−$98k
’25
4.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Stalfana Bello Broadhead MPA

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed888888888
Joined·+1+0+0+1+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·10010000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $101k → $145k.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Physicians Medical Forum’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Physicians Medical Forum leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Physicians Medical Forum.

49%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 81% · 2019 100% · 2020 88% · 2021 88% · 2022 80% · 2023 52% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Physicians Medical Forum's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $86k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Physicians Medical Forum's funding base is broadening — from 2 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−114% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−12% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,360 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like Physicians Medical Forum

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

65% of spending goes to programs.

Program 65%Management 13%Fundraising 22%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Physicians Medical Forum: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Physicians Medical Forum?
Physicians Medical Forum (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,180,956 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA WELLNESS FOUNDATION ($580,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Physicians Medical Forum have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $1,180,956 in grants to Physicians Medical Forum, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Physicians Medical Forum?
THE CALIFORNIA WELLNESS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $580,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Physicians Medical Forum find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Physicians Medical Forum →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing