Loading…
Loading…
Arizona · Nonprofit
NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Arizona) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $51,560 in grants to it, the largest being LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ($51,464). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT's revenue fell 100% between 2018 and 2023.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,212 community improvement nonprofits under $100k, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
99% of NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Arizona — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 1 states in all.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $448k on record — $125k federal, $323k state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
85%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing