Loading…
Loading…
Indiana · Nonprofit
National Collegiate Athletic Association (Indiana) is funded by 5 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $2,250,420 in grants to it, the largest being Dallas Convention & Visitors Bureau ($1,580,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
National Collegiate Athletic Association's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 2 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 18 recreation & sports nonprofits over $100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of National Collegiate Athletic Association’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (2% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $50k → $128k.
From the IRS filings of National Collegiate Athletic Association’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
National Collegiate Athletic Association leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 72% · 2020 50% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 95% · 2024 77% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
National Collegiate Athletic Association draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Indiana — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $22k on record — $21k federal, $900 state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
99% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 8 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing