Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM

MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM (Ohio) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,773,217 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ($843,799). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$23M
Funders on record
11
Grants received
$1.8M
Net assets
$4.8M
6/11 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Murtis Taylor Human Services System does

Mission

The mission of Murtis Taylor Human Services System is to support, empower and strengthen individuals, families and communities to become healthy and productive through effective, integrated health and human services.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Ameriwell pharmacy- to provide and foster emotional, mental and physical wellness through the delivery of human services and products, directly and through collaboration, to adults, children and families in need.

    $8,606,563 spent$8,845,574 earned by the program
    44% of program spending
  2. Community support- adults : cpst services for adults are designed to assist individuals to succeed in the community, identify & access needed services, and show improvement in school, work, family & community.

    $3,855,444 spentof which $3,840 as grants$4,083,691 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  3. Behavioral health- children: service integrates systems such as family, school, county jobs & family services and provides behavioral health treatment for the whole child within the context of the family situation

    $1,605,914 spent$1,314,812 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  4. Day treatment-adults

    $626,863 spentof which $22,365 as grants$1,105,406 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  5. Outpatient services

    $1,437,961 spentof which $385 as grants$868,818 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  6. Family/child welfare, parent advocacy

    $706,126 spentof which $9,025 as grants
    4% of program spending
  7. Residential therapeutic community

    $659,271 spentof which $9,782 as grants$617,063 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  8. Care access now

    $764,084 spent
    4% of program spending
  9. Youth mentoring

    $46,378 spent
    0% of program spending
  10. Childcare program

    $636,220 spentof which $12,984 as grants$215,763 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  11. Senior meals and transportation

    $371,137 spentof which $16,446 as grants$183,969 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  12. Substance use disorder treatment

    $181,379 spentof which $1,075 as grants$152,248 earned by the program
    1% of program spending

The 12 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $19,497,340.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($25M) Expenses 100 ($25M) Net assets 100 ($961k)2018 Revenue 97 ($24M) Expenses 93 ($24M) Net assets 173 ($1.7M)2019 Revenue 93 ($23M) Expenses 94 ($24M) Net assets 139 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 91 ($23M) Expenses 89 ($23M) Net assets 143 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 91 ($23M) Expenses 85 ($22M) Net assets 269 ($2.6M)2022 Revenue 82 ($21M) Expenses 85 ($22M) Net assets 163 ($1.6M)2023 Revenue 99 ($25M) Expenses 87 ($22M) Net assets 460 ($4.4M)2024 Revenue 90 ($23M) Expenses 87 ($22M) Net assets 499 ($4.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (90)Expenses (87)Net assets (499)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $5.5M to $8.7M (+59%).

$5.1M
$7.2M
$5.8M
$8.2M
$6.1M
$5.5M
$8.7M
$9.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 7% · 2018 7% · 2019 6% · 2020 9% · 2021 22% · 2022 16% · 2023 35% · 2024 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

21% of MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (7% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,743 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$285k
’17
$700k
’18
−$329k
’19
$45k
’20
$1.2M
’21
−$1.0M
’22
$2.9M
’23
$371k
’24
1.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Lovell J Custard

President & CEO

Board chair

Darian Johnson

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2923262724232328
Joined·+4+7+2+2+1+1+9
No longer listed·10415214
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 4 funders, grant income rose $273k → $300k.

3 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 8 of 11 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM.

48%
largest funder
93%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 93% · 2018 96% · 2019 96% · 2020 64% · 2021 51% · 2022 82% · 2023 98% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

100% of MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM's grant income comes from Ohio funders.

OH

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $160k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve1.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,580 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Government funding MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $5.6M on record.

Federal$5.6M
grants $5.6Mcontracts $0
21
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$4.8M
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$796k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM?
MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM (Ohio) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,773,217 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ($843,799). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM have?
IRS filings report 11 organizations giving $1,773,217 in grants to MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM?
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND is the largest funder on record, with $843,799 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Murtis Taylor Human Services System →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing