Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION

MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $595,951 to it, the largest being DE LA LUZ FAMILY FOUNDATION ($236,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.2M
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
$596k
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−6% · below the median
Months of reserve3.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,604 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($741k)2018 Revenue 121 ($1.6M) Expenses 104 ($1.2M) Net assets 152 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 117 ($1.5M) Expenses 135 ($1.5M) Net assets 149 ($1.1M)2020 Revenue 106 ($1.4M) Expenses 110 ($1.2M) Net assets 166 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 123 ($1.6M) Expenses 114 ($1.3M) Net assets 206 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 112 ($1.4M) Expenses 128 ($1.4M) Net assets 206 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 106 ($1.4M) Expenses 123 ($1.4M) Net assets 202 ($1.5M)2024 Revenue 97 ($1.2M) Expenses 117 ($1.3M) Net assets 193 ($1.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (97)Expenses (117)Net assets (193)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,669 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$157k
17
$386k
18
$20k
19
$123k
20
$297k
21
$2k
22
$27k
23
$70k
24
3.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $1k → $45k.

4 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 40% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

60% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION.

40%
largest funder
81%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 99% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 76% · 2022 100% · 2023 55%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
21
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $214k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

71% of spending goes to programs.

Program 71%Management 27%Fundraising 1%

Governance

6
board members
50%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION?
MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $595,951 to it, the largest being DE LA LUZ FAMILY FOUNDATION ($236,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $595,951 in grants to MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION?
DE LA LUZ FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $236,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MID-INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing