Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Wisconsin · Nonprofit

Mad-City Ski Team Inc

Mad-City Ski Team Inc (Wisconsin) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,766 to it, the largest being Thrivent Financial for Lutherans ($27,055). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$170k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
$31k
Grants received
$96k
Net assets
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%

Against its field

Mad-City Ski Team Inc runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 15,485 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin34% · top quartile
Months of reserve0.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,485 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($138k) Expenses 100 ($101k) Net assets 100 ($147k)2018 Revenue 86 ($119k) Expenses 111 ($111k) Net assets 106 ($155k)2019 Revenue 63 ($87k) Expenses 121 ($122k) Net assets 82 ($120k)2020 Revenue 35 ($48k) Expenses 67 ($67k) Net assets 69 ($101k)2021 Revenue 51 ($70k) Expenses 109 ($110k) Net assets 42 ($62k)2022 Revenue 64 ($88k) Expenses 129 ($130k) Net assets 14 ($20k)2023 Revenue 103 ($142k) Expenses 122 ($123k) Net assets 27 ($39k)2024 Revenue 123 ($170k) Expenses 113 ($113k) Net assets 66 ($96k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (123)Expenses (113)Net assets (66)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

34% of Mad-City Ski Team Inc’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,078 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$38k
17
$8k
18
$35k
19
$19k
20
$39k
21
$42k
22
$19k
23
$57k
24
0.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $11k → $201.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
2
2
1
3
1
1
1
1

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Mad-City Ski Team Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Mad-City Ski Team Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 88% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

90% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Mad-City Ski Team Inc.

88%
largest funder
98%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 95% · 2018 93% · 2019 100% · 2020 94% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Mad-City Ski Team Inc draws 92% of its grant income from funders outside Wisconsin, across 3 states in all.

MN
IL
WI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
Wisconsin out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $711 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Mad-City Ski Team Inc

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Wisconsin

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Mad-City Ski Team Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Mad-City Ski Team Inc?
Mad-City Ski Team Inc (Wisconsin) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,766 to it, the largest being Thrivent Financial for Lutherans ($27,055). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Mad-City Ski Team Inc have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $30,766 in grants to Mad-City Ski Team Inc, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Mad-City Ski Team Inc?
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans is the largest funder on record, with $27,055 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Mad-City Ski Team Inc find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing