Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

USA Swimming Inc

Usa swimming provides programs and services for our members,supporters, affiliates, and the interested public.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$10MEducation$296kHealth$35kYouth Development$22kHuman Services$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kCommunity Improvement$7kEmployment$5k
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 31 grants below total $464,010 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,032,393 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,568,383 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CSCAA$100,000
Norfolk State University$40,000
Diversity in Aquatics$36,000
SwimMac Carolina$18,080
Sandpipers of Nevada$13,100
Carmel Swim Club$12,700
Nations Capital Swim Club$11,520
Sarasota Sharks$11,420
Lakeside Swim Team$10,740
Long Island Aquatic Club$10,740
Red Wave Swim Team$10,290
Bolles School Sharks$10,240
RMSC Parents Club$10,030
Fayetteville State University$10,000
Grambling State University$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SARASOTA YMCA SHARKS: $13k → 9%PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 8%SARASOTA SHARKS: $6k → 9%SARASOTA YMCA: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 56 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
45

Total granted

$8.6M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+36%

Still filing today

68%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4.4M · revenue +170%
  • CS
    College Swimming Coaches Association of America Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $900k · revenue +19% · 28% of their budget
  • US
    USA Swimming Foundation Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $854k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • US
    USA Swimming Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.6M · revenue +32%
  • IU
    Indiana University School of Medicine
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • SP
    SWIMMING PATRONS OF SANTA MONICAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $21k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Radnor Aquatic Club Inc

The Radnor Aquatic Club is a partnership of swimmers, parents and coaches whose main objective is to build a foundation and genuine positive attitude towards the sport of swimming on all levels ranging from the developmental swimmer to the…

Recreation & Sports
2
Charter Oak Aquatic Club Inc

A community dedicated to maintaining a positive, structured and balanced environment as it supports its athlete members in the pursuit of excellence in the sport of swimming.

3
Walnut Creek Aquabears Swim Team

Provide competitive swim instruction to children ages 5 to 19. Instruction is after school and on weekends. Swimmers compete in local, regional, and national meets. Walnut Creek Aquabears is a member club of USA Swimming, our sport's…

4
St Croix Swim Club

St. Croix Swim Club is a year-round competitive swim team offering professional coaching for the novice through highly experienced swimmer. Our goal is to promote the sport of swimming and encourage each swimmer to set goals and strive…

Recreation & Sports
5
Clinton Swim Club

To practice and develop the amateur sport of competitive swimming for children ages 5-20.

6
Daly City Dolphins Aquatics Association

Youth swimming and swimming competition.

Recreation & Sports
7
Hamburg Swim Club

Hamburg Swim Club offers a progressive, levelled swim program for youths ages 4 and up. We provide opportunities for skills development and competitive performance. We promote the development of life skills through the sport of swimming in…

Recreation & Sports
8
Sunnyvale Swim Club

Our mission is to provide a high quality, affordable, competitive swim program for children and youth, ages 4 and up who are residents of Sunnyvale, CA and surrounding cities.

9
California Dolphins Swim Team Inc

CDST is committed to excellence and dedicated to developing the finest as well as the finest of citizens through the sport of swimming and competitive swimming program.

Recreation & Sports
10
Sonoran Desert Aquatics

To provide aquatics programming for all ages and levels of swimmers.

Recreation & Sports
11
Bellevue Swim Club

This is a sports service club focusing on swimming. the club has organized lessons and swim meets. to provide techical training competitive opportunities and safety instruction for young persons and future athletes.

Recreation & Sports
12
Temecula Tritons Swim Club

Provide competitive and recreational swim instruction to ages 5 through adult.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Aquatic Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lane College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Ymca Youth DevelopmentFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%8%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr12%36%35–55yr13%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr21%11%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr12%9%35–55yr13%58%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/108
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,309

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/65
Grantees still filing
52/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE — $4,430,551 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEEUSA Swimming Inc — $1,625,371 · Recreation & SportsUSA Swimming IncCollege Swimming Coaches Association of America Inc — $900,000 · Recreation & SportsCollege Swimming Coaches Association of America IncUSA Swimming Foundation Inc — $854,076 · Recreation & SportsUSA Swimming Foundation Inc+32 more — $987,527 · Recreation & Sports+32 moreCALIFORNIA AQUATICS — $134,333 · OtherCALIFORNIA AQUATI…ATHENS BULLDOG SWIM CLUB INC — $120,000 · OtherATHENS BULLDOG SW…Nation's Capital Swim Club — $118,750 · OtherNation's Capital …MECKLENBURG AQUATIC CLUB — $106,974 · OtherMECKLENBURG AQUAT…CARMEL SWIM CLUB INC — $94,766 · OtherCARMEL SWIM CLUB …Southern Nevada Sandpiper Swimming Booster Club — $88,703 · OtherNORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY — $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $65,481 · OtherDynamo Parents' Club Inc — $60,566 · Other+53 more — $811,329 · Other+53 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $60,000 · EducationTHE BOLLES SCHOOL — $41,965 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $30,000 · EducationLANE COLLEGE — $20,000 · EducationPARENT BOOSTER USA INC — $15,745 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $8,350 · EducationSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC — $31,772 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC — $9,340 · Human ServicesAGGIE SWIM CLUB — $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentDEKALB AQUATICS SWIM INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Recreation & Sports$8,797,525Other$1,670,902Education$176,060Human Services$41,112Youth Development$14,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE — $4,430,551 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUSA Swimming Inc — $1,625,371 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCollege Swimming Coaches Association of America Inc — $900,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetUSA Swimming Foundation Inc — $854,076 over 2y, 20% of budgetDiversity in Aquatics — $138,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetMECKLENBURG AQUATIC CLUB — $106,974 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCARMEL SWIM CLUB INC — $94,766 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSouthern Nevada Sandpiper Swimming Booster Club — $88,703 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTRIANGLE AQUATIC CENTER — $64,150 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLOUISVILLE SEAHAWKS INC — $63,792 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMISSION VIEJO NADADORES FOUNDATION — $63,652 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetLONG ISLAND SWIMMING LTD — $61,062 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDynamo Parents' Club Inc — $60,566 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA OF VIRGINIA AQUATICS INC — $49,472 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLakeside Aquatic Club — $47,303 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMARLINS OF RALEIGH INC — $46,351 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOLLES SCHOOL — $41,965 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLUB WOLVERINE SWIMMING INC — $40,711 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetAMATEUR SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC — $39,293 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetPLEASANTON SEAHAWKS INC — $38,251 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetIRVINE NOVAQUATICS INC — $37,084 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFORT COLLINS AREA SWIM TEAM — $33,112 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSARASOTA SHARKS INC — $32,660 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC — $31,772 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Ford Dealers Aquatics Inc — $31,262 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTSDALE AQUATIC CLUB INC — $29,398 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNEWJETS INC — $28,161 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetELMBROOK SWIM CLUB LTD — $27,130 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTENNESSEE AQUATICS INC — $22,854 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY CLIPPERS SWIMMING INC — $21,735 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSWIMMING PATRONS OF SANTA MONICA — $20,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLANE COLLEGE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana Swim Club — $20,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetRed Wave Swim Team — $19,270 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTROJAN SWIM CLUB — $18,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetPARENT BOOSTER USA INC — $15,745 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH BALTIMORE AQUATIC CLUB INC — $12,644 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetIRVINE AQUAZOT SWIM CLUB INC — $12,497 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDAYTON RAIDERS SWIM CLUB INC — $11,774 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSIERRA MARLINS SWIM TEAM — $10,318 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIV FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAHAINA SWIM CLUB INC — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBREA AQUATICS ASSOCIATION INC — $9,739 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetROSE BOWL AQUATICS SWIM TEAM BOOSTER CLUB — $9,390 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC — $9,340 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHARKS SWIM TEAM — $8,860 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE
  • Who funds USA Swimming Inc
  • Who funds College Swimming Coaches Association of America Inc
  • Who funds USA Swimming Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Diversity in Aquatics
  • Who funds ATHENS BULLDOG SWIM CLUB INC
  • Who funds MECKLENBURG AQUATIC CLUB
  • Who funds CARMEL SWIM CLUB INC
  • Who funds Southern Nevada Sandpiper Swimming Booster Club
  • Who funds TRIANGLE AQUATIC CENTER
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE SEAHAWKS INC
  • Who funds MISSION VIEJO NADADORES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND SWIMMING LTD
  • Who funds Dynamo Parents' Club Inc
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NOVA OF VIRGINIA AQUATICS INC
  • Who funds Lakeside Aquatic Club
  • Who funds MARLINS OF RALEIGH INC
  • Who funds THE BOLLES SCHOOL
  • Who funds CLUB WOLVERINE SWIMMING INC
  • Who funds AMATEUR SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PLEASANTON SEAHAWKS INC
  • Who funds IRVINE NOVAQUATICS INC
  • Who funds FORT COLLINS AREA SWIM TEAM
  • Who funds SARASOTA SHARKS INC
  • Who funds SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC
  • Who funds Tucson Ford Dealers Aquatics Inc
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
  • Who funds NASHVILLE AQUATIC CLUB INC
  • Who funds SCOTTSDALE AQUATIC CLUB INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

USA Swimming Foundation IncCO39.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: USA Swimming Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Educational Credit Management Corporation · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Thurgood Marshall College Fund · Partnership for Education Advancement Inc · Howard Hughes Medical Institute · Folds of Honor Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization USA Swimming Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Safe Children Coalition Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph