Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

INKAS

INKAS (Utah) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,163 to it, the largest being Geoffrey Schmidt Foundation ($10,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$250k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$12k
Net assets
$374k
2/5 repeat funders
01What it does

What Inkas does

Mission

The rescue and rehabilitation of abandoned, abused, neglected and unwanted animalsto provide care and a no-kill shelter to animals in needto find good homes for animals in needto keep and care for old and/or special needs animalsto create a spay/neuter fund and help end pet overpopulationto teach children the importance of gentle care and sensitive treatment towards all animals

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Provide veterinarian service to needy animals that would have otherwise gone without.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  2. Special event expenses for fundraising events.

    $194 spent
    1% of program spending
  3. Provide food, supplies, and grooming to needy animals that would have otherwise gone without.

    $1,517 spent
    4% of program spending
  4. Special projects

    $36,946 spent
    96% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $38,657.

02The organization over time
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $580 → $263.

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INKAS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INKAS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 82% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

82%
largest funder
95%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2020 100% · 2021 91% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

95% of INKAS's grant income comes from Utah funders.

NY
UT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’21
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INKAS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,693 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin84% · top quartile
Months of reserve109.6mo · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like INKAS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
0%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INKAS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INKAS?
INKAS (Utah) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,163 to it, the largest being Geoffrey Schmidt Foundation ($10,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INKAS have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $12,163 in grants to INKAS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INKAS?
Geoffrey Schmidt Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INKAS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Inkas →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2025–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing