Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

Hearts 4 Paws

Hearts 4 Paws (Utah) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,479 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($2,479). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$76k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$3k
Net assets
$8k
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Hearts 4 Paws does

Mission

The purpose of our nonprofit is to rescue dogs that would be euthanized and rehome them for life. We also education about animal care and ensure the dogs are spayed and neutered.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. The purpose of our nonprofit is to rescue dogs that would be euthanized and rehome them for life. We also education about animal care and ensure the dogs are spayed and neutered.

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($46k) Expenses 100 ($54k) Net assets 0 ($0)2018 Revenue 188 ($87k) Expenses 148 ($80k) Net assets 100 ($9k)2019 Revenue 207 ($95k) Expenses 185 ($100k) Net assets 15 ($1k)2020 Revenue 127 ($59k) Expenses 106 ($57k) Net assets 32 ($3k)2021 Revenue 208 ($96k) Expenses 174 ($94k) Net assets 50 ($4k)2022 Revenue 296 ($137k) Expenses 254 ($138k) Net assets 35 ($3k)2023 Revenue 260 ($120k) Expenses 227 ($123k) Net assets 4 ($332)2024 Revenue 206 ($95k) Expenses 171 ($93k) Net assets 30 ($3k)2025 Revenue 165 ($76k) Expenses 131 ($71k) Net assets 92 ($8k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (165)Expenses (131)Net assets (92)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $9k to $1k (−85%).

$0
$9k
$1k
$3k
$4k
$3k
$332
$3k
$8k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Hearts 4 Paws’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,580 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$8k
’17
$7k
’18
−$5k
’19
$1k
’20
$2k
’21
−$1k
’22
−$3k
’23
$2k
’24
$5k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $1k → $677.

Funder
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 71% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Hearts 4 Paws’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 2 of 3 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Hearts 4 Paws leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Hearts 4 Paws.

71%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

71% of Hearts 4 Paws's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Utah, across 1 state.

DC

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Hearts 4 Paws runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,315 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin7% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,315 animals nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like Hearts 4 Paws

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

35%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Hearts 4 Paws: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Hearts 4 Paws?
Hearts 4 Paws (Utah) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,479 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($2,479). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Hearts 4 Paws have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $3,479 in grants to Hearts 4 Paws, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Hearts 4 Paws?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,479 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Hearts 4 Paws find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Hearts 4 Paws →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing