California · Nonprofit
Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative
Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $81,054 to it, the largest being CERITY PARTNERS FOUNDATION ($35,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Palo Alto Community Fundshared funderslocal
- The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violenceportfolio match
- Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violenceportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 33% · 2018 47% · 2020 3% · 2022 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $26k → $10k.
4 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 70% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 69%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
94% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 43% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
70% of Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $25k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $56k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Palo Alto Community Fundshared funderslocalCA · backs 29 organizations that share your funders · funds 111 organizations near you
- The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violenceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violenceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mary Kay Ash Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Texas Council on Family Violence Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violenceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Michigan Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violenceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Greater Wisconsin Agency on Aging Resources Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kansas Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violenceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Animal Nations Dba Redroverportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violenceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
95% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative?
- Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $81,054 to it, the largest being CERITY PARTNERS FOUNDATION ($35,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $81,054 in grants to Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative?
- CERITY PARTNERS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $35,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Domestic Violence Intervention Collaborative find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing