Loading…
Loading…
Kansas · Nonprofit
IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST (Kansas) is funded by 8 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $529,381,496 in grants to it, the largest being IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($480,166,292). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 126 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 126 philanthropy nonprofits over $100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
98% of IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 4 as grant income moved $4.3M → $153M.
3 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 91% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 8 funders by total. Association, not causation.
IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 80% · 2021 98% · 2022 100% · 2023 74% · 2024 99% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST is locally rooted: 91% of its grant income comes from Kansas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 3 states
Part of a family of 50 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing