Minnesota · Nonprofit
IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP
IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP (Minnesota) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $358,741 to it, the largest being THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ($111,046). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Buuck Family Foundationshared funders
- Segal Family Foundation Incportfolio match
- Micah 68 Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $2k → $59k.
7 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 99% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 31% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 52% · 2021 81% · 2022 38% · 2023 41% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
75% of IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 100% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
99% of IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $5k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Minnesota funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $353k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Buuck Family Foundationshared fundersAZ · backs 11 organizations that share your funders
- Segal Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Micah 68 Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Vf Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Journey Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Rapidan Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Together Women Riseportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- One Days Wagesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Good Works Institute Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Project Redwoodportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Rotary Club of Indianapolis Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- CG Charitable Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Minnesota
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
93% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP?
- IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP (Minnesota) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $358,741 to it, the largest being THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ($111,046). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $358,741 in grants to IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP?
- THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $111,046 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like IMARA INTERNATIONAL KRIS THORP find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing