Alabama · Nonprofit
HATCH HSV
HATCH HSV (Alabama) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $65,800 to it, the largest being The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation ($19,367). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2024
- $205k
- Funders on record
- 5
- Grants received
- $66k
- Net assets
- $154k
What Hatch Hsv does
Mission
To combine life skills workshops with hospitality and culinary training into an intensive eight-week life changing program.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
Hatch participants train for all areas of our growing hospitality industry by participating in kitchen instruction time. Students will work with the executive chef in the kitchen as early as the second week of classes to hone their skills in the kitchen.they will be given the opportunity to work as busser, runner, server, host, dish, salad, prep and fry station preparing them for their future career. Students prepare and share two meals per day with the other students in the cohort. These meals, along with other group projects and kitchen competitions, teach teamwork and form bonds between students. Time is spent creating resumes, honing interview skills, and managing online social media presence so that each student can present the best possible version of themselves to potential employers. Hatch Hsv received the donated use of a facilitiy for training use at a value of $60,000.
$204,082 spent82% of program spendingFinancial literacy is a cornerstone of the hatch program. Students are given a $1250 stipend as an incentive while participating in the program. By partnering with local banks, students are introduced to fundamental banking and budgeting skills to give them the ability to manage finances today and to build for a better future.
$44,414 spent18% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $248,496.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $76k to $178k (+135%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2023 87% · 2024 93%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
105% of HATCH HSV’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
4 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 71% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HATCH HSV’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
HATCH HSV leans on a few funders — its largest provides 29% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HATCH HSV.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
71% of HATCH HSV's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $19k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Alabama funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $46k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
HATCH HSV is better cushioned than half of the 5,688 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,688 youth development nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like HATCH HSV
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Alabama
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
95% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
71%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HATCH HSV: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds HATCH HSV?
- HATCH HSV (Alabama) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $65,800 to it, the largest being The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation ($19,367). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does HATCH HSV have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $65,800 in grants to HATCH HSV.
- Who is the largest funder of HATCH HSV?
- The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $19,367 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like HATCH HSV find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alabama. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Hatch Hsv →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing