Oregon · Nonprofit
GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK
GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK (Oregon) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,732 to it, the largest being LIGHT BRIGADE MINISTRIES ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $248k
- Funders on record
- 4
- Grants received
- $16k
- Net assets
- $480k
What Good Neighbor Network does
Mission
Using the Samaritan model we seek to help those unable to help themselves offer education to those needing skills to provide for themselves and encourage all to notice their neighbor and lend a hand whether it be socially physically financially spiritually or emotionally.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Ukraine-Throughout the year we have maintained the operation of all our centers ensuring a secure haven for widows facilitating enriching childrens camps and establishing valuable volunteer prospects for young individuals. Additionally our counseling center has persistently delivered no-cost and affordable services to aid victims of war individuals battling addiction and families seeking guidance through parenting classes.
$100,707 spent52% of program spendingZambia-The organization disbursed salaries to 15 educators and support staff at a school. Additionally it allocated resources for the construction of a second school building including materials like cement bricks and labor. The nonprofit sponsored students at various educational levels including support for those attending other schools and universities. Furthermore it organized and executed youth-focused events throughout the year and provided daily meals for all students and personnel five days a week. The organization also developed and supplied educational curriculum for five local churches and financed the drilling of two boreholes in 2025 to enhance community health and well-being. Moreover it initiated a goat program for pastors enabling them to breed and distribute offspring to benefit the wider community. The organization conducted famine relief efforts through food distribution in the spring and supported a youth gathering with financial assistance.
$53,500 spent28% of program spendingMalawi-Our agricultural program supports 120 farmers in growing groundnuts to sustain their families and provide protein for the elderly and nursery schools. We fund teacher salaries for three nursery schools and provide daily lunches for all students. Additionally we cover staff salaries in four locations that host weekly support groups for the elderly widows and women. Monthly food distribution is organized for elderly widows groups. We have constructed a meeting hall nursery school and community center. Salary support is provided for a financial and communication director. During famine months we offer community support with food to elderly and widows who are unable to farm covering transport costs for food distribution throughout the year.
$29,408 spent15% of program spendingZimbabwe: The nonprofit incurred costs for Alecs salary and transportation throughout the year to facilitate various programs including the construction of house walls windows and doors. Additionally funds were allocated for food distribution during a period of famine providing essential support to communities in need. Moreover the organization continued its water purification efforts by utilizing training and infrastructure established in the previous year ensuring clean water access for vulnerable populations. Routine maintenance on the organizations van was also conducted to support operational efficiency and program delivery.
$5,500 spent3% of program spendingHope for Widows and Orphans- Have worked hard to bring hope and healing to women and children here and around the world in 2025. Our work has been with local shelters for women who have had abused and have been victims of sex trafficking. Working with Foster care bringing basic needs. We have been working with Orphanages and single moms in Africa bringing humanitarian needs medicine & shelter.
$4,186 spent2% of program spending
The 5 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $193,301.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $499k to $443k (−11%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
67% of GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (87% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Jill Hartzell
Executive Director
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $700 → $5k.
2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 64% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
68% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $732 arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 4,505 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,505 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Organizations like GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oregon
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
89% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK?
- GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK (Oregon) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,732 to it, the largest being LIGHT BRIGADE MINISTRIES ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $15,732 in grants to GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK?
- LIGHT BRIGADE MINISTRIES is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like GOOD NEIGHBOR NETWORK find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Good Neighbor Network →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing