Loading…
Loading…
Arizona · Nonprofit
GATHERING HUMANITY INC (Arizona) is funded by 9 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $123,262 in grants to it, the largest being NO MISSING LINKS FOUNDATION ($80,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GATHERING HUMANITY INC has grown faster than half of the 6,570 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,570 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of GATHERING HUMANITY INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (84% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 3 funders to 4 as grant income moved $2k → $60k.
3 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 17% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of GATHERING HUMANITY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 9 funders by total. Association, not causation.
GATHERING HUMANITY INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 65% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 83% · 2021 95% · 2022 96% · 2023 99% · 2024 83% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
GATHERING HUMANITY INC is locally rooted: 65% of its grant income comes from Arizona funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
95% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing