Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Tennessee · Nonprofit

GAINING GROUND

GAINING GROUND (Tennessee) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $226,832 to it, the largest being Robert F Stone Foundation aka Bobby Stone Foundation ($126,880). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$225k
Revenue FY2025
6
Funders on record
$227k
Grants received
$32k
Net assets
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 61%

Against its field

GAINING GROUND has grown faster than three-quarters of the 1,749 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−38% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)41% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,749 food & nutrition nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($41k) Expenses 100 ($24k) Net assets 100 ($17k)2021 Revenue 176 ($72k) Expenses 132 ($31k) Net assets 336 ($57k)2022 Revenue 178 ($73k) Expenses 380 ($90k) Net assets 232 ($40k)2023 Revenue 654 ($266k) Expenses 1001 ($237k) Net assets 413 ($70k)2024 Revenue 747 ($304k) Expenses 1086 ($258k) Net assets 688 ($117k)2025 Revenue 553 ($225k) Expenses 1310 ($311k) Net assets 186 ($32k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (553)Expenses (1310)Net assets (186)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 52% · 2023 81% · 2024 52% · 2025 26%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

67% of GAINING GROUND’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (95% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,353 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
20
$40k
21
$18k
22
$29k
23
$47k
24
$85k
25
5.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $25k → $84k.

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GAINING GROUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GAINING GROUND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

28% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GAINING GROUND.

56%
largest funder
95%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 32%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

GAINING GROUND draws 78% of its grant income from funders outside Tennessee, across 2 states in all.

DE
TN

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
21
23
Tennessee out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $64k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like GAINING GROUND

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Tennessee

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 38%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GAINING GROUND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GAINING GROUND?
GAINING GROUND (Tennessee) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $226,832 to it, the largest being Robert F Stone Foundation aka Bobby Stone Foundation ($126,880). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GAINING GROUND have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $226,832 in grants to GAINING GROUND, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GAINING GROUND?
Robert F Stone Foundation aka Bobby Stone Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $126,880 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GAINING GROUND find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Tennessee. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing