Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
FINE PRINT FUNDING INC (California) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $87,702 in grants to it, the largest being ELIZABETH AND JOHN MOLLER FOUNDATION ($60,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
FINE PRINT FUNDING INC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 21,172 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,172 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2022
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $3k → $23k.
2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of FINE PRINT FUNDING INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
FINE PRINT FUNDING INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 68% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 41% · 2021 99% · 2022 90% · 2023 97% · 2024 89% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
FINE PRINT FUNDING INC is locally rooted: 93% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2022–2022), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing