Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE

ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE (California) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,392,685 to it, the largest being THE MARISLA FOUNDATION ($1,100,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.1M
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$3.4M
Net assets
$1.2M
10/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 50%
01What it does

What Endangered Habitats League does

Mission

EHL leads the way toward a better future for southern California through the creation of secure intact native landscapes where diverse, abundant wildlife thrives, by building sustainable human communities with a high quality of life for everyone, and by protecting rural and agricultural lands from being overrun by urban sprawl.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Since 1991, the Endangered Habitats League has worked on Californias Natural Communities Conservation Planning program. EHL works with local and state advisory groups, reviews and analyzes technical documents, appears in legal proceedings, comments on and/or initiates relevant scientific studies for regional climate action and land use programs. EHL served on the Tejon Ranch Conservancy Board of Directors and on advisory committees in San Diego and Orange Counties, in the former to adopt a new North County habitat plan and in the latter to direct Measure M funding to create connectivity between NCCP regions. In San Bernardino County, in 2025, EHL made progress in its goal to preserve vital habitat for the endangered San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat and restore the upper Santa Ana River. The launch of the Greater Prado Basin Habitat Conservation Plan complements this effort. In Riverside County, EHL worked to protect a regional wildlife linkage along Temecula Creek. EHL participated in a consortium that introduces fishermen to gear systems that do not entangle whales.

    $431,004 spentof which $102,000 as grants
    34% of program spending
  2. EHL takes an active role in cross-border protection of habitats common to Baja California and southern California. EHL partners with Terra Peninsular and Jardin Botanico de San Quintin, Baja-based non-profits which protect habitat in Baja California through land purchases and conservation agreements with land owners, and through education programs for local residents. In 2007 and again in 2012, EHL assisted with important transactions that protected key coastal properties. In 2024, EHL continued assistance to Terra Peninsular for the stewardship of these lands, the undertaking of supporting scientific studies, and, in particular, by protecting legal rights to an essential estuary in the preserve.

    $663,824 spentof which $651,749 as grants
    52% of program spending
  3. In 2006, EHL established the Endangered Habitats Conservancy for the purpose of holding land and conservation easements and managing them for their habitat values. The Conservancy has undertaken extensive habitat restoration programs along the San Diego River and elsewhere, primarily in San Diego County. In 2007, the first acquisition of 314 acres of coastal sage scrub habitat was completed, forming a southern extension of the Crestridge Ecological Preserve. Work continued on acquisition of a two-mile stretch of river basin for habitat restoration and park uses with additional purchases in 2008 and 2009 for a cumulative investment of more than 10,000,000. In 2013, EHL completed the transfer of ownership and management of these lands to EHC. In 2024, EHL continued facilitating the purchase of additional conservation property through a grant for transaction costs and operating support.

    $180,000 spentof which $180,000 as grants
    14% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,274,828.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($900k) Net assets 100 ($526k)2018 Revenue 105 ($1.1M) Expenses 117 ($1.1M) Net assets 114 ($600k)2019 Revenue 108 ($1.1M) Expenses 110 ($991k) Net assets 144 ($757k)2020 Revenue 77 ($819k) Expenses 94 ($846k) Net assets 140 ($735k)2021 Revenue 167 ($1.8M) Expenses 119 ($1.1M) Net assets 276 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 99 ($1.1M) Expenses 155 ($1.4M) Net assets 205 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 86 ($917k) Expenses 80 ($721k) Net assets 245 ($1.3M)2024 Revenue 111 ($1.2M) Expenses 118 ($1.1M) Net assets 274 ($1.4M)2025 Revenue 103 ($1.1M) Expenses 146 ($1.3M) Net assets 235 ($1.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (103)Expenses (146)Net assets (235)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $735k to $1.4M (+97%).

$526k
$599k
$758k
$735k
$1.4M
$1.1M
$1.3M
$1.4M
$1.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

83% of ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (74% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,657 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$168k
’17
$74k
’18
$157k
’19
−$28k
’20
$717k
’21
−$339k
’22
$196k
’23
$131k
’24
−$211k
’25
7.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Daniel Silver

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed777777666
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·00000100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $123k → $455k.

5 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 37% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $100k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Endangered Habitats Conservancy). These are real filings, and they are not money ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE raised.

From the IRS filings of ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 32% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

55% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE.

32%
largest funder
62%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 50% · 2019 34% · 2020 77% · 2021 68% · 2022 38% · 2023 44% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 83% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

79% of ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.2M arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE is better cushioned than half of the 717 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−19% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve7.7mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 717 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Endangered Habitats Conservancy · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE?
ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE (California) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,392,685 to it, the largest being THE MARISLA FOUNDATION ($1,100,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $3,392,685 in grants to ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE?
THE MARISLA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing